Hottub VC
Join free

Austin

Austin-Round Rock-San Marcos, TX MSA Texas

Overall score60.2#6 of 32 metro areas
Development56.7Size of activity
Growth68.5#7 in growth
Startup raises1,031$15.5B sold · 350 venture funds raised $7.2B

Activity by quarter

Startup raises per quarter
peak 60Q4 2020: 362020Q1 2021: 552021Q2 2021: 46Q3 2021: 59Q4 2021: 41Q1 2022: 602022Q2 2022: 35Q3 2022: 47Q4 2022: 40Q1 2023: 512023Q2 2023: 44Q3 2023: 38Q4 2023: 36Q1 2024: 382024Q2 2024: 34Q3 2024: 33Q4 2024: 31Q1 2025: 492025Q2 2025: 39Q3 2025: 55Q4 2025: 42Q1 2026: 322026Q2 2026: 48Q3 2026: 42
Venture funds per quarter
peak 29Q4 2020: 72020Q1 2021: 122021Q2 2021: 14Q3 2021: 18Q4 2021: 14Q1 2022: 192022Q2 2022: 20Q3 2022: 17Q4 2022: 12Q1 2023: 192023Q2 2023: 13Q3 2023: 5Q4 2023: 7Q1 2024: 102024Q2 2024: 17Q3 2024: 7Q4 2024: 7Q1 2025: 152025Q2 2025: 24Q3 2025: 13Q4 2025: 15Q1 2026: 292026Q2 2026: 15Q3 2026: 21
YearStartup raisesStartup dollarsVenture fundsVenture fund dollars
Q4 2020–Q3 2021196$3.1B51$2.2B
Q4 2021–Q3 2022183$1.9B70$2B
Q4 2022–Q3 2023173$1.8B49$1.1B
Q4 2023–Q3 2024141$1.4B41$900M
Q4 2024–Q3 2025174$2.4B59$205M
Q4 2025–Q3 2026164$5B80$839M

Score breakdown

Development scales each six-year total 0–100 between the smallest and largest ranked metro areas; Growth is each measure’s momentum as a percentile among them.

MeasureSix-year totalDevelopmentLast 2 years vs prior 2Last year vs priorGrowth
Startup raises1,03156.8+8%−6%45.2
Startup dollars raised$15.5B54.3+140%+108%100.0
Venture funds35061.6+54%+36%67.7
Venture fund dollars$7.2B54.1−47%+310%61.3

Venture firms headquartered here

From our Venture Capital Fund Index, with commitments that public LPs (Alameda County Employees' Retirement Association (ACERA), Alaska Permanent Fund Corporation (APFC), Alaska Retirement Management Board (ARMB), Andra AP-fonden (AP2), Arkansas Teacher Retirement System (ATRS), CalPERS, CalSTRS, Chicago Teachers' Pension Fund (CTPF), Colorado Public Employees' Retirement Association (Colorado PERA), Connecticut Retirement Plans and Trust Funds (CRPTF), Contra Costa County Employees' Retirement Association (CCCERA), District of Columbia Retirement Board (DCRB), Employees' Retirement System of Rhode Island (ERSRI), Employees' Retirement System of the State of Hawaii (HIERS), Enterprise Ireland (Seed and Venture Capital Scheme), European Investment Fund (EIF), Fire and Police Pension Association of Colorado (FPPA), Greater Manchester Pension Fund (GMPF), Illinois Growth and Innovation Fund (Illinois State Treasurer), International Finance Corporation (IFC), Ireland Strategic Investment Fund, Kentucky Public Pensions Authority (KPPA), KfW Capital, Korea Venture Investment Corp. (Foreign VC Investment Fund), LACERA, Los Angeles City Employees' Retirement System (LACERS), Maine Public Employees Retirement System (MainePERS), Merseyside Pension Fund, Minnesota State Board of Investment, Montana Board of Investments, NYC Board of Education Retirement System (BERS), NYC Employees' Retirement System (NYCERS), NYC Fire Pension Fund, NYC Police Pension Fund, NYC Teachers' Retirement System, Nebraska Investment Council, New Hampshire Retirement System (NHRS), New Jersey Division of Investment, New Mexico Educational Retirement Board (NMERB), New Mexico State Investment Council, New York State Common Retirement Fund, New York Ventures (Empire State Development), New Zealand Superannuation Fund, Norfund (Norwegian Investment Fund for Developing Countries), North Carolina Retirement Systems (NCRS), Orange County Employees Retirement System (OCERS), Oregon Growth Account (Oregon Growth Board), Oregon State Treasury (OPERF), Pennsylvania PSERS, Pennsylvania SERS, Public Employee Retirement System of Idaho (PERSI), Public School and Education Employee Retirement Systems of Missouri (PSRS/PEERS), San Bernardino County Employees' Retirement Association (SBCERA), San Diego County Employees Retirement Association (SDCERA), South Carolina Retirement System Investment Commission (RSIC), South Dakota Investment Council (South Dakota Retirement System), State Universities Retirement System of Illinois (SURS), State of Michigan Retirement System (SMRS), State of Wisconsin Investment Board (SWIB), Teachers' Retirement System of Oklahoma (OTRS), Teachers' Retirement System of the State of Illinois (TRS), Teachers' Retirement System of the State of Kentucky (TRS), Texas Municipal Retirement System, US International Development Finance Corporation (DFC), UTIMCO (Permanent University Fund), University of California, Washington State Investment Board, West Yorkshire Pension Fund (WYPF)) report to each firm’s funds.

FirmHeadquartersLatest fundPublic LP commitments
8VCAustin$1.5B2026—
S3 VenturesAustin$250M2025—
Silverton PartnersAustin$248M2022—
LiveOak Venture PartnersAustin$210M2021$-0M2 funds
Next Coast VenturesAustin$195M2022$20M3 funds
LAUNCHAustin$34M2024—
ATP FundAustin——
Clutch VCAustin——

Public LPs report $20M committed to 5 funds managed by these firms (all vintages). Commitments aren’t part of the score.

How the index works

Every company and fund raising money privately in the US files a Form D notice with the SEC within 15 days of its first sale. We count each new offering once, in the quarter of its first notice, at the amount sold in its latest amendment. Startup raises are offerings by operating companies in technology, health care, energy, manufacturing, business services, and financial services (excluding banks and debt-only offerings). Venture funds are pooled funds that describe themselves as venture capital funds, excluding single-deal and series vehicles (SPVs) and feeder funds.

Offerings are placed by the issuer’s ZIP code in its combined statistical area, or its metropolitan area where there isn’t one. Addresses shared by 25 or more unrelated issuers (registered agents, fund administrators, mail drops) are left out, because they don’t say where a company works.

Development averages four measures over the whole period: the number of startup raises, the dollars they sold, the number of venture funds, and the dollars they raised. Each is scaled 0–100 on a log scale between the smallest and largest ranked area. Growth averages, for the same four measures, the change in the last two years against the two before and in the last year against the one before, as a percentile among ranked areas. Overall is 70% Development plus 30% Growth. Areas need 150 startup raises and 10 venture funds in the period to be ranked.

Form D undercounts: some issuers never file, and amounts are self-reported. Amounts sold grow as issuers amend their notices, so the latest quarters’ dollars run low until they do. Delaware and Wyoming still include companies that list a smaller registered agent’s address rather than where they work. Firms are placed in a metro by their headquarters city. Data through September 30, 2026. Sources: SEC Form D data sets; US Census Bureau 2020 ZCTA to county relationship file; OMB 2023 metropolitan area delineations (NBER county crosswalk).