Hottub VC
Join free

HongShan China Expansion I

HongShan Vintage 2022 Reported by University of California

Net IRRN/MUniversity of California, as of June 30, 2025
TVPI—Total value / paid-in
DPI0.00xDistributions / paid-in
Versus vintage—Not ranked

What each LP reports

LPAs ofCommittedPaid inDistributedRemaining valueNet IRRTVPIDPIPaid in vs. value
University of California2025-06-30$135M$21M$0M$22MN/M—0.00x

Paid in Distributed Remaining value

2022 vintage in University of California’s portfolio

All 18 funds of vintage 2022 in University of California’s report, ranked by net IRR. Private equity, venture, and other strategies are mixed, so treat this as context rather than a strategy benchmark.

#FundNet IRRTVPIDPI
—Thoma Bravo XVN/M—0.04x
—Sequoia Capital FundN/M—0.27x
—Thoma Bravo Discover IVN/M—0.20x
—EQT XN/M—0.05x
—Bregal Sagemount IVN/M—0.03x
—ICONIQ Strategic Partners VIIN/M—0.00x
—MSA Acceleration FundN/M—0.06x
—HongShan China Growth VIIN/M—0.00x
—HongShan China Expansion IN/M—0.00x
—Peak XV Partners India Growth IVN/M—0.00x
—Blackstone Capital Partners IXN/M—0.00x
—HongShan China Venture IXN/M—0.00x
—L'Attitude Ventures IIN/M—0.00x
—Peak XV Partners India Venture VIIIN/M—0.00x
—Collide CapitalN/M—0.00x
—HongShan China Seed IIIN/M—0.00x
—Peak XV Partners SEA IN/M—0.00x
—Soma Capital IIIN/M—0.00x

Other reported funds by this firm

About this data

University of California: UC Regents Private Equity Investments (Alternative Investments: Private Equity Internal Rates of Return), as of June 30, 2025. Net IRR and total value multiple as reported by the UC Regents; IRRs are calculated by a third-party service provider from UC's own cash flows and may differ from the GP's. Vintage year is based on first cash flow. Funds in their first three years are reported as NM (shown as blank). Active partnerships only; exited funds are not listed. View source

Figures are as each LP reports them for its own investment, so they can differ between LPs because of timing, fees, and share class. Not investment advice.