Hottub VC
Join free

Mayfield XI

Mayfield Vintage 2000 Reported by Employees' Retirement System of the State of Hawaii (HIERS)

Net IRRN/MEmployees' Retirement System of the State of Hawaii (HIERS), as of March 31, 2026
TVPI—Total value / paid-in
DPI—Distributions / paid-in
Versus vintage—Not ranked

What each LP reports

LPAs ofCommittedPaid inDistributedRemaining valueNet IRRTVPIDPIPaid in vs. value
Employees' Retirement System of the State of Hawaii (HIERS)2026-03-31$3.2M$2.8M——N/M——

Paid in Distributed Remaining value

2000 vintage in Employees' Retirement System of the State of Hawaii (HIERS)’s portfolio

All 14 funds of vintage 2000 in Employees' Retirement System of the State of Hawaii (HIERS)’s report, ranked by net IRR. Private equity, venture, and other strategies are mixed, so treat this as context rather than a strategy benchmark.

#FundNet IRRTVPIDPI
—Alta Communications VIII, L.P.N/M——
—Boston Ventures VI, L.P.N/M——
—Columbia Capital Equity Partners II (QP), L.P.N/M——
—GTCR Fund VII, L.P.N/M——
—M/C Venture Partners V, L.P.N/M——
—Madison Dearborn Capital Partners IV, L.P.N/M——
—Mayfield XI, LPN/M——
—Mezzanine Management Fund III, L.P.N/M——
—Morgenthaler Partners VI, L.P.N/M——
—TA IX, L.P.N/M——
—TA Subordinated Debt Fund, L.P.N/M——
—Thomas H. Lee Equity Fund V, L.P.N/M——
—U.S. Venture Partners VII, L.P.N/M——
—Welsh, Carson, Anderson & Stowe IX, L.P.N/M——

Other reported funds by this firm

FundVintageNet IRRTVPIVersus vintage
Mayfield Select III2025N/M1.16x
Mayfield XVII2024N/M1.53x
Mayfield Select II202117.2%1.55xTop quartile
Mayfield XVI202118.6%1.62xTop quartile
Mayfield Select201714.8%1.75xThird quartile
Mayfield XV201716.3%2.37xThird quartile
Mayfield Select A Cayman Islands Exempted Limited Partnership2016N/M—
Mayfield XV A Cayman Islands Exempted Limited Partnership2016N/M—
Mayfield XIV201319.3%3.74xTop quartile
Mayfield XIV A Cayman Islands Exempted Limited Partnership2012N/M—
Mayfield X Annex2002N/M—
Mayfield X1999N/M—

About this data

Employees' Retirement System of the State of Hawaii (HIERS): HIERS Private Equity Partnerships: Performance Summary by Investment, as of March 31, 2026. ERS posts a quarterly "Performance Summary by Investment" of its private equity partnerships in which only "Capital Committed", "Paid-In Capital" and "Reported Market Value" (with the date of that value) are filled in; the Capital Distributed, Remaining Cost, Net IRR and TVM columns are empty in the published version. So committed, paid-in and market value are shown, in whole US dollars as printed, and distributed, total value, IRR, TVPI and DPI are blank; nothing is derived or estimated. The report says paid-in capital includes both commitment and non-commitment reducing capital calls, that cash flows are HIERS' actual cash paid and received, and that market values reflect HIERS' unrealized interest in each investment. "Vintage Year" is as printed. All 371 investments are included as ERS classifies them by strategy (61 Buyout - Large, 42 Buyout - Mega, 59 Buyout - Mid, 13 Buyout - Small, 3 Co/Direct Investment, 6 Distressed Debt, 40 Growth Equity, 10 Mezzanine, 2 Secondaries, 10 Special Situations, 125 Venture Capital), in the report's blocks: Core (334), Stafford Capital Management - 1 (8), Stafford Capital Management - 2 (11), Stafford Capital Management - 3 (17), Stafford Ho'oulu Fund (1); the Stafford Capital Management blocks list the partnerships held through the Hawaii Targeted Investment Program funds (HiTIP I, II and III) that ERS's Holdings page also reports separately. They add up to the printed Grand Total of $8,371,769,464 committed, $6,707,086,129 paid in and $5,197,639,074 reported market value. 114 investments have no remaining value (liquidated, or not yet called), shown as 0; 9 others carry a value dated before the report date. Each page of the report carries the legend "Institutional Use Only/Not for Public Use | Proprietary and Confidential"; this is the version ERS itself posts on its Holdings page. ERS's separate private credit, real assets and timber reports are not imported. View source

Figures are as each LP reports them for its own investment, so they can differ between LPs because of timing, fees, and share class. Not investment advice.