Hottub VC
Join free

Scale Venture Partners III

Scale Venture Partners Vintage 2009 Reported by NYC Police Pension Fund

Net IRR22.1%NYC Police Pension Fund, as of March 31, 2026
TVPI2.74xTotal value / paid-in
DPI2.74xDistributions / paid-in
Versus vintageQ1Top quartile · #2 of 8

What each LP reports

LPAs ofCommittedPaid inDistributedRemaining valueNet IRRTVPIDPIPaid in vs. value
NYC Police Pension Fund2026-03-31$10M$10M$27M$0M22.1%2.74x2.74x

Paid in Distributed Remaining value

2009 vintage in NYC Police Pension Fund’s portfolio

All 8 funds of vintage 2009 in NYC Police Pension Fund’s report, ranked by net IRR. Private equity, venture, and other strategies are mixed, so treat this as context rather than a strategy benchmark.

FS Equity Partners VI: 23.7%Scale Venture Partners III: 22.1%Lexington Capital Partners VII: 13.5%NorthBound Emerging Manager Custom Fund (fka NB Emerging Manager Custom Fu: 11.7%Welsh, Carson, Anderson & Stowe XI: 11.5%BDCM Opportunity Fund III: 8.0%Lincolnshire Equity Fund IV-A: 7.4%Clayton, Dubilier & Rice Fund VIII: 6.2%6.2%23.7%
#FundNet IRRTVPIDPI
1FS Equity Partners VI23.7%3.40x3.40x
2Scale Venture Partners III22.1%2.74x2.74x
3Lexington Capital Partners VII13.5%1.64x1.62x
4NorthBound Emerging Manager Custom Fund (fka NB Emerging Manager Custom Fu11.7%1.63x1.63x
5Welsh, Carson, Anderson & Stowe XI11.5%1.67x1.67x
6BDCM Opportunity Fund III8.0%1.64x1.64x
7Lincolnshire Equity Fund IV-A7.4%1.41x1.30x
8Clayton, Dubilier & Rice Fund VIII6.2%1.14x1.14x

Other reported funds by this firm

FundVintageNet IRRTVPIVersus vintage
Scale Ventures VIII20223.9%1.04xBottom quartile
Scale Ventures VII2021-4.7%0.84xBottom quartile
Scale Venture Partners V—N/M—
Scale Venture Partners VII—N/M—
Scale Venture Partners VIII—N/M—

About this data

NYC Police Pension Fund: New York City Police Pension Fund Private Equity Quarterly Report (Public): fund schedule, as of March 31, 2026. From the Private Equity Quarterly Report (Public) in the fund's quarterly investment meeting package, a portfolio report that carries Aksia's legend, published by the New York City Comptroller's Bureau of Asset Management. The report is dated "As Of Mar-2026", taken here as that month's last day. The schedule's return column is headed "Current Quarter IRR"; the footnote to its PME Spread column calls it "the Net IRR", and the portfolio figure in that column is 11.0%. TVPI is the printed "Multiple" (it equals (total distributions + market value) / total contributions); total value = total distributions + market value and DPI = total distributions / total contributions are computed. Contributed is the report's "Total Contributions" and vintage its "Vintage". IRR is blank where the report prints n.m. (55 investments; the report says IRR is not meaningful for investments held less than 24 months) or leaves the cell empty (3 investments: Celtic Pharmaceutical Holdings; Markstone Capital Partners; Medica III); the multiple is blank where the report prints n.m. (18 investments with nothing contributed) and, here, for 1 investment whose contributions are negative as printed (Warburg Pincus Financial Sector III), since a multiple of negative contributions is not a return multiple; 2 rows carry a negative market value as printed. Included are 213 active investments and 165 investments the schedule marks "Liquidated" (none has a remaining market value): funds, co-investment vehicles and emerging manager vehicles (the schedule gives no strategy per row). The schedule also has 4 rows (NYCP - 2012 Emerging Manager Program; NYCP - 2015 Emerging Manager Program; NYCP - 2019 Emerging Manager Program; NYCP - Evergreen Emerging Manager Program) for program vehicles whose funds it lists one by one: the other 378 rows add up to the printed Total Portfolio ($13,668,939,880 committed, $5,838,773,651 market value), and the 213 of them not marked liquidated match the report's count of 213 active investments, so those program rows are left out rather than counted twice. Real estate, infrastructure and credit are reported separately and are not imported. View source

Figures are as each LP reports them for its own investment, so they can differ between LPs because of timing, fees, and share class. Not investment advice.