Iconiq Strategic Partners IV
ICONIQ Growth Vintage 2019 Reported by University of California
What each LP reports
| LP | As of | Committed | Paid in | Distributed | Remaining value | Net IRR | TVPI | DPI | Paid in vs. value |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| University of California | 2025-06-30 | $10M | $10M | $8.2M | $10M | 14.5% | 1.81x | 0.82x |
Paid in Distributed Remaining value
2019 vintage in University of California’s portfolio
All 12 funds of vintage 2019 in University of California’s report, ranked by net IRR. Private equity, venture, and other strategies are mixed, so treat this as context rather than a strategy benchmark.
| # | Fund | Net IRR | TVPI | DPI |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Olympus Growth Fund VII | 26.4% | 1.92x | 1.00x |
| 2 | Blackstone Strategic Partners VIII | 21.3% | 1.56x | 0.83x |
| 3 | Peak XV Partners India Seed Fund I | 17.7% | 2.14x | 0.17x |
| 4 | Iconiq Strategic Partners IV L.P. | 14.5% | 1.81x | 0.82x |
| 5 | Bregal Sagemount Equity III | 12.3% | 1.42x | 0.31x |
| 6 | Blackstone Capital Partners VIII | 10.0% | 1.26x | 0.21x |
| 7 | H.I.G. Middle Market LBO Fund III | 8.6% | 1.25x | 0.47x |
| 8 | Arsenal Capital Partners V LP | 6.8% | 1.32x | 0.33x |
| 9 | Vida Ventures II | 2.1% | 1.08x | 0.63x |
| 10 | Column Group IV | -1.8% | 0.95x | 0.07x |
| 11 | NeoTribe Ventures II, L.P. | -2.3% | 0.94x | 0.02x |
| 12 | ZMC III | -9.5% | 0.75x | 0.04x |
Other reported funds by this firm
| Fund | Vintage | Net IRR | TVPI | Versus vintage |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| ICONIQ Strategic Partners VII | 2022 | 19.2% | 1.28x | Second quartile |
| ICONIQ Strategic Partners VI | 2021 | 5.2% | 1.21x | Bottom quartile |
| ICONIQ Strategic Partners VII | — | N/M | 1.28x |
About this data
University of California: UC Regents Private Equity Investments (Alternative Investments: Private Equity Internal Rates of Return), as of June 30, 2025. Net IRR and total value multiple as reported by the UC Regents; IRRs are calculated by a third-party service provider from UC's own cash flows and may differ from the GP's. Vintage year is based on first cash flow. Funds in their first three years are reported as NM (shown as blank). Active partnerships only; exited funds are not listed. View source
Figures are as each LP reports them for its own investment, so they can differ between LPs because of timing, fees, and share class. Not investment advice.