ICONIQ Strategic Partners VII
ICONIQ Growth Vintage 2022 Reported by New Mexico State Investment Council, University of California
What each LP reports
| LP | As of | Committed | Paid in | Distributed | Remaining value | Net IRR | TVPI | DPI | Paid in vs. value |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| New Mexico State Investment Council | 2026-03-31 | $25M | — | — | — | 19.2% | 1.28x | — | |
| University of California | 2025-06-30 | $100M | $57M | $0M | $61M | N/M | — | 0.00x |
Paid in Distributed Remaining value
2022 vintage in New Mexico State Investment Council’s portfolio
All 19 funds of vintage 2022 in New Mexico State Investment Council’s report, ranked by net IRR. Private equity, venture, and other strategies are mixed, so treat this as context rather than a strategy benchmark.
| # | Fund | Net IRR | TVPI | DPI |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Menlo Inflection III, L.P. | 45.0% | 2.09x | — |
| 2 | Lightspeed Venture Partners XIV, L.P. | 40.8% | 2.62x | — |
| 3 | Lightspeed Opportunity Fund II, L.P. | 37.1% | 2.17x | — |
| 4 | Lightspeed Venture Partners XIV-B (Ignite), L.P. | 34.5% | 2.08x | — |
| 5 | Lightspeed Venture Partners Select V, L.P. | 27.6% | 1.86x | — |
| 6 | Bain Capital Europe Fund VI, SCSp | 25.6% | 1.38x | — |
| 7 | Scout Ventures Fund IV, L.P. | 22.3% | 1.45x | — |
| 8 | CRV XIX, LP | 22.2% | 1.48x | — |
| 9 | ICONIQ Strategic Partners VII, L.P. | 19.2% | 1.28x | — |
| 10 | Bain Capital Tech Opportunities Fund II, L.P. | 17.0% | 1.29x | — |
| 11 | Advent International GPE X, L.P. | 13.4% | 1.29x | — |
| 12 | CRV Select Fund II, LP | 11.2% | 1.37x | — |
| 13 | Lead Edge Capital VI, L.P. | 9.8% | 1.12x | — |
| 14 | TDR Capital Fund V, L.P. | 9.4% | 1.10x | — |
| 15 | JMI Equity Fund XI, L.P. | 7.2% | 1.10x | — |
| 16 | Cure Ventures Fund I, L.P. | 5.1% | 1.08x | — |
| 17 | Scale Ventures VIII, L.P. | 3.9% | 1.04x | — |
| 18 | Kickstart Seed Fund VI, L.P. | -1.5% | 0.97x | — |
| 19 | CerraCap Ventures III, L.P. | -4.1% | 0.91x | — |
2022 vintage in University of California’s portfolio
All 18 funds of vintage 2022 in University of California’s report, ranked by net IRR. Private equity, venture, and other strategies are mixed, so treat this as context rather than a strategy benchmark.
| # | Fund | Net IRR | TVPI | DPI |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| — | Thoma Bravo XV | N/M | — | 0.04x |
| — | Sequoia Capital Fund | N/M | — | 0.27x |
| — | Thoma Bravo Discover IV | N/M | — | 0.20x |
| — | EQT X | N/M | — | 0.05x |
| — | Bregal Sagemount IV | N/M | — | 0.03x |
| — | ICONIQ Strategic Partners VII | N/M | — | 0.00x |
| — | MSA Acceleration Fund | N/M | — | 0.06x |
| — | HongShan China Growth VII | N/M | — | 0.00x |
| — | HongShan China Expansion I | N/M | — | 0.00x |
| — | Peak XV Partners India Growth IV | N/M | — | 0.00x |
| — | Blackstone Capital Partners IX | N/M | — | 0.00x |
| — | HongShan China Venture IX | N/M | — | 0.00x |
| — | L'Attitude Ventures II | N/M | — | 0.00x |
| — | Peak XV Partners India Venture VIII | N/M | — | 0.00x |
| — | Collide Capital | N/M | — | 0.00x |
| — | HongShan China Seed III | N/M | — | 0.00x |
| — | Peak XV Partners SEA I | N/M | — | 0.00x |
| — | Soma Capital III | N/M | — | 0.00x |
Other reported funds by this firm
| Fund | Vintage | Net IRR | TVPI | Versus vintage |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| ICONIQ Strategic Partners VI | 2021 | 5.2% | 1.21x | Bottom quartile |
| Iconiq Strategic Partners IV | 2019 | 14.5% | 1.81x | Second quartile |
| ICONIQ Strategic Partners VII | — | N/M | 1.28x |
About this data
New Mexico State Investment Council: New Mexico State Investment Council Private Equity Performance Updates: Fund Summaries (Active Funds), as of March 31, 2026. Net IRR and net multiple since inception as printed in the fund summaries of the quarterly performance updates that Mercer prepares for the Council (data source given as Invient), published in the Council's public meeting materials. The fund summaries head the two columns "Net" (Multiple, IRR); their total rows equal the "Net Multiple" and "Net IRR" of active commitments in the reports' dashboards. The net multiple is used as TVPI. The fund summaries give only committed capital, exposure (NAV + unfunded), net multiple and IRR for each fund, so contributions, distributions, total value and DPI are blank; contributions and distributions are reported by program and strategy only. Committed capital is reported in $ millions to one decimal and converted to whole dollars. Vintage year is defined by the reports as the year of the fund's first cash flow. 27 of the newest funds are marked N/A or NM (not defined in the reports) and lack an IRR, a multiple or both. The IRR of The Veritas Capital Fund IX, L.P. is printed as "#######" (not readable) and is blank. Frazier Healthcare Growth Buyout Fund XI, L.P. is printed with a negative multiple, imported as printed. Two reports are combined: the National Private Equity Program (175 active funds, $11,121.7 million committed; 32 Venture Capital, 93 Buyout, 33 Growth, 17 Special Situations) and the Strategic Venture Capital Program and New Mexico Private Equity Investment Program (Legacy) (83 active funds, $2,346.3 million committed; 76 Fund Investments, 5 Co-Investment Funds, 1 Catalyst Fund, 1 Recovery Fund). The second report covers the Council's New Mexico-focused venture and private equity commitments, including its own co-investment, catalyst and recovery vehicles. Active funds only: liquidated and sold funds are reported in aggregate, not by fund. The Private Debt, Real Estate and Real Assets reports in the same materials are not imported. View source
University of California: UC Regents Private Equity Investments (Alternative Investments: Private Equity Internal Rates of Return), as of June 30, 2025. Net IRR and total value multiple as reported by the UC Regents; IRRs are calculated by a third-party service provider from UC's own cash flows and may differ from the GP's. Vintage year is based on first cash flow. Funds in their first three years are reported as NM (shown as blank). Active partnerships only; exited funds are not listed. View source
Figures are as each LP reports them for its own investment, so they can differ between LPs because of timing, fees, and share class. Not investment advice.