Hottub VC
Join free

Spark Capital Growth Fund III

Spark Capital Vintage 2020 Reported by Los Angeles City Employees' Retirement System (LACERS), Orange County Employees Retirement System (OCERS)

Net IRR21.4%Los Angeles City Employees' Retirement System (LACERS), as of December 31, 2025
TVPI2.29xTotal value / paid-in
DPI0.19xDistributions / paid-in
Versus vintageQ1Top quartile · #4 of 26

What each LP reports

LPAs ofCommittedPaid inDistributedRemaining valueNet IRRTVPIDPIPaid in vs. value
Los Angeles City Employees' Retirement System (LACERS)2025-12-31$27M$27M$5.1M$56M21.4%2.29x0.19x
Orange County Employees Retirement System (OCERS)2025-12-31$33M$33M$6.4M$70M21.4%2.30x—

Paid in Distributed Remaining value

2020 vintage in Los Angeles City Employees' Retirement System (LACERS)’s portfolio

All 26 funds of vintage 2020 in Los Angeles City Employees' Retirement System (LACERS)’s report, ranked by net IRR. Private equity, venture, and other strategies are mixed, so treat this as context rather than a strategy benchmark.

Samson Hockey 1: 33.1%NMS Fund IV: 24.7%Thoma Bravo Explore Fund: 23.9%Spark Capital Growth Fund III: 21.4%GTCR Fund XIII-AB: 18.9%H&F Arrow 1: 18.7%Sunstone Partners II: 17.8%H.I.G. Europe Middle Market LBO Fund: 17.2%Hg Genesis 9: 16.5%Barings Emerging Generation Fund: 16.2%Stellex Capital Partners II LP: 14.5%HgCapital Saturn Fund 2: 13.1%Vitruvian Investment Partnership IV: 12.8%Thoma Bravo Discover Fund III: 11.0%Fortress Credit Opportunities V Expansion: 10.4%KPS Special Situations Fund V: 10.3%Clearlake Capital Partners VI: 10.1%General Catalyst Group X - Early Venture: 9.6%General Catalyst Group X - Growth Venture: 7.9%Spark Capital VI: 7.8%Samson Shield 1: 7.5%Biospring Partners Fund: 6.5%General Catalyst Group X - Endurance: 6.1%Montagu VI: 5.7%Vista Foundation Fund IV: 2.8%Ulu Ventures Fund III: -11.1%-11.1%33.1%
#FundNet IRRTVPIDPI
1Samson Hockey 133.1%2.22x2.22x
2NMS Fund IV24.7%1.54x0.59x
3Thoma Bravo Explore Fund23.9%1.94x0.32x
4Spark Capital Growth Fund III21.4%2.29x0.19x
5GTCR Fund XIII-AB18.9%1.53x0.44x
6H&F Arrow 118.7%2.07x1.06x
7Sunstone Partners II17.8%1.58x0.60x
8H.I.G. Europe Middle Market LBO Fund17.2%1.31x0.25x
9Hg Genesis 916.5%1.60x0.43x
10Barings Emerging Generation Fund16.2%1.60x0.34x
11Stellex Capital Partners II LP14.5%1.45x0.22x
12HgCapital Saturn Fund 213.1%1.43x0.34x
13Vitruvian Investment Partnership IV12.8%1.49x0.09x
14Thoma Bravo Discover Fund III11.0%1.52x0.07x
15Fortress Credit Opportunities V Expansion10.4%1.23x0.44x
16KPS Special Situations Fund V10.3%1.29x0.46x
17Clearlake Capital Partners VI10.1%1.46x0.25x
18General Catalyst Group X - Early Venture9.6%1.54x0.00x
19General Catalyst Group X - Growth Venture7.9%1.44x0.00x
20Spark Capital VI7.8%1.37x0.00x
21Samson Shield 17.5%1.29x0.77x
22Biospring Partners Fund6.5%1.15x0.14x
23General Catalyst Group X - Endurance6.1%1.33x0.31x
24Montagu VI5.7%1.13x0.25x
25Vista Foundation Fund IV2.8%1.10x0.00x
26Ulu Ventures Fund III-11.1%0.64x0.00x

2020 vintage in Orange County Employees Retirement System (OCERS)’s portfolio

All 16 funds of vintage 2020 in Orange County Employees Retirement System (OCERS)’s report, ranked by net IRR. Private equity, venture, and other strategies are mixed, so treat this as context rather than a strategy benchmark.

DBL Partners TIAB 2020: 61.2%Spark Capital Growth Fund III: 21.4%H.I.G. Europe Middle Market LBO Fund: 17.3%Stellex Capital Partners II: 14.5%Hg Genesis 9: 14.3%HgCapital Saturn Fund 2: 13.1%Vitruvian Investment Partnership IV: 12.0%Trident VIII: 11.6%Clearlake Capital Partners VI: 10.1%General Catalyst Group X - Early Venture: 9.6%Altaris Health Partners V: 8.2%General Catalyst Group X - Growth Venture: 7.9%Spark Capital VI: 7.8%General Catalyst Group X - Endurance: 6.1%H.I.G. Capital Partners VI: 5.9%FSN Capital VI: 3.1%3.1%61.2%
#FundNet IRRTVPIDPI
1DBL Partners TIAB 202061.2%13.30x—
2Spark Capital Growth Fund III21.4%2.30x—
3H.I.G. Europe Middle Market LBO Fund17.3%1.30x—
4Stellex Capital Partners II14.5%1.40x—
5Hg Genesis 914.3%1.50x—
6HgCapital Saturn Fund 213.1%1.40x—
7Vitruvian Investment Partnership IV12.0%1.50x—
8Trident VIII11.6%1.60x—
9Clearlake Capital Partners VI10.1%1.50x—
10General Catalyst Group X - Early Venture9.6%1.50x—
11Altaris Health Partners V8.2%1.20x—
12General Catalyst Group X - Growth Venture7.9%1.40x—
13Spark Capital VI7.8%1.40x—
14General Catalyst Group X - Endurance6.1%1.30x—
15H.I.G. Capital Partners VI5.9%1.10x—
16FSN Capital VI3.1%1.10x—

Other reported funds by this firm

FundVintageNet IRRTVPIVersus vintage
Spark Capital Fund VIII2024-3.9%0.98xThird quartile
Spark Capital Growth Fund V2024N/M—
Spark Capital VIII2024N/M—
Spark Capital Growth Fund IV202143.6%2.29xTop quartile
Spark Capital VII202119.7%1.57xTop quartile
Spark Capital VI20207.8%1.37xBottom quartile
Spark Capital Growth Fund II201716.5%1.99xSecond quartile
Spark Capital Growth Fund201428.3%6.12xTop quartile
Spark Capital IV2013N/M—
Spark Capital III201123.9%3.40xTop quartile
Spark Capital II200851.4%5.42xTop quartile
Spark Capital20057.8%1.37xSecond quartile
SPARK CAPITAL II—N/M—
Spark Capital VIII—N/M—
Spark Capital VIII, Growth Fund V—N/M—
Spark Growth V—N/M—

About this data

Los Angeles City Employees' Retirement System (LACERS): LACERS Private Equity Portfolio Performance Report, as of December 31, 2025. "Net IRR" and "Net TVPI" as printed in the fund-by-fund appendix of the Private Equity Portfolio Performance Report that LACERS posts semiannually (prepared on its private equity consultant's template; the cover gives www.aksia.com). The report defines TVPI as (cumulative distributions + fair market value) / cumulative contributions and labels IRRs of investments held less than two years "n.m."; 27 funds have no IRR (n.m., or "-" in the report) and 14 have no multiple ("-", mostly commitments with nothing contributed yet), all shown as blank. Dollar amounts are whole US dollars as reported (inception-to-date contributions and distributions). Total value = distributions + fair market value, and DPI = distributions / contributions, are computed. All 408 partnerships in the report are included: 305 active and 103 liquidated (no remaining fair market value), of which 23 are in LACERS' Specialized Portfolio and the rest in its Core Portfolio. LACERS counts 36 Credit/Distressed and 15 Natural Resources (energy) partnerships as private equity in this report, alongside buyout, growth equity, venture capital, secondaries, co-investment and fund-of-funds vehicles; its separate private credit and real estate reports are not imported. View source

Orange County Employees Retirement System (OCERS): OCERS Private Equity Portfolio Summary, as of December 31, 2025. "Net IRR" and "TVPI" as printed in the "Portfolio Summary by Status" of the quarterly OCERS - Private Equity Portfolio Report that OCERS posts on its website (the report's legend names Aksia LLC as its source). The report gives every amount in $ millions to one decimal; they are converted to whole dollars here, so each is rounded to the nearest $100,000: Total Commitment, Contributions and Distributions. Total value = Distributions + NAV is computed; DPI is left blank because amounts rounded to $0.1 million do not give a reliable ratio for small funds. Vintage is the report's "Vintage Year". The report marks the IRR of investments held less than 24 months "n.m." (not meaningful); 64 funds have no IRR (n.m., or "-" for commitments with nothing contributed yet) and 17 have no TVPI, all shown as blank. 12 funds' values are marked by the report as adjusted for contributions and distributions since the last valuation, which is before the report date. All 237 funds in the report are included: 211 active and 26 liquidated (no remaining NAV), adding up to the report's printed totals of $6.90 billion committed, $5.09 billion contributed and $5.39 billion NAV. OCERS's private equity portfolio as it reports it includes funds of funds, secondaries, co-investments and a few private credit funds; its separate Real Assets and Real Estate summaries are not imported. View source

Figures are as each LP reports them for its own investment, so they can differ between LPs because of timing, fees, and share class. Not investment advice.