Tiger Global Management

Overview

PIP 16 launched in 2022 with a $6B target and ended at about $2.2B; the year shown is the launch year. PIP 17 targeted about $2.2B, with a first close planned for March 18, 2026. No final PIP 17 size was found.

Funds

LPs on the record

48 private foundations list on their latest IRS Form 990-PF, and 10 other LPs report holding Tiger Global Management’s funds.

• The Chase and Stephanie Coleman Foundation Private foundation · 10 funds
• Lyndhurst Foundation Inc Private foundation · 7 funds
• Richard & Susan Smith Family Foundation Private foundation · 6 funds

55 more LPs are in the app. Find LPs that back firms like this one in Hottub’s LP Intelligence: ranked by overlap, with what each holds and how to reach it.

Firms whose LPs overlap

The firms sharing the most LPs on record with Tiger Global Management, relative to how many LPs each has. A peer set like this is what Find LPs ranks LPs from.

• Qiming Venture Partners 6 LPs in common
• Avf Management LLC 3 LPs in common
• Qiming U.S. Ventures Management, LLC 3 LPs in common
• Acrew Diversify Capital Management, L.P. 3 LPs in common
• Andreessen Horowitz 5 LPs in common
• Westbridge Capital 3 LPs in common

Find LPs for Tiger Global Management and these firms: Hottub ranks the LPs that hold their funds, the ones still adding funds first.

Track record

A score of 27 out of 100 from 2 of the 3 funds public LPs report, 0 of them in the top half of their vintage. Its ranked funds’ median TVPI is 0.79x and median DPI 0.00x. Pooled where reports give cash flows: 0.82x TVPI, 0.00x DPI. That ranks it 121st of 123 managers with a score.

Each fund once, as the latest of 2 LPs’ reports ranks it by TVPI against funds of the same vintage in those reports; 50 is the median fund, and a short record is pulled toward 50. The full record in LP Intelligence, with each fund’s rank and what usually follows a fund like its latest, or every manager’s.

Reported fund performance

As reported by public LPs that invested in these funds, net of fees. “Versus vintage” ranks each fund against every other fund of the same vintage in that LP’s report, mostly private equity and venture funds. Open a fund for its cash flows and full peer ranking.

CalPERS: CalPERS Private Equity Program Fund Performance, as of December 31, 2025. Net IRR and investment multiple as reported by CalPERS. N/M (not meaningful) for funds in early years is shown as blank. View source

CalSTRS: CalSTRS Private Equity Portfolio Performance, as of June 30, 2025. Since-inception IRR as calculated by CalSTRS from its own cash flows with each partnership; CalSTRS does not label it net or gross; because it is computed from CalSTRS's own contributions and distributions, it is after the partnership's fees and carried interest. CalSTRS says IRRs in a partnership's first three years are not meaningful. CalSTRS reports no multiple: TVPI = (distributed + market value) / contributed and DPI = distributed / contributed are computed. IRR is blank for commitments with no capital contributed. View source