Hottub VC
Join free

New York

New York-Newark, NY-NJ-CT-PA CSA New York, New Jersey

Overall score80.4#2 of 32 metro areas
Development89.6Size of activity
Growth58.9#11 in growth
Startup raises4,000$71.7B sold · 1,717 venture funds raised $82.3B

Activity by quarter

Startup raises per quarter
peak 231Q4 2020: 1602020Q1 2021: 2092021Q2 2021: 209Q3 2021: 225Q4 2021: 197Q1 2022: 2312022Q2 2022: 162Q3 2022: 196Q4 2022: 153Q1 2023: 1642023Q2 2023: 159Q3 2023: 157Q4 2023: 136Q1 2024: 1612024Q2 2024: 149Q3 2024: 143Q4 2024: 134Q1 2025: 1482025Q2 2025: 129Q3 2025: 157Q4 2025: 130Q1 2026: 1452026Q2 2026: 181Q3 2026: 165
Venture funds per quarter
peak 137Q4 2020: 552020Q1 2021: 692021Q2 2021: 97Q3 2021: 77Q4 2021: 103Q1 2022: 1372022Q2 2022: 93Q3 2022: 66Q4 2022: 43Q1 2023: 442023Q2 2023: 45Q3 2023: 47Q4 2023: 44Q1 2024: 452024Q2 2024: 53Q3 2024: 62Q4 2024: 56Q1 2025: 562025Q2 2025: 58Q3 2025: 76Q4 2025: 78Q1 2026: 722026Q2 2026: 120Q3 2026: 121
YearStartup raisesStartup dollarsVenture fundsVenture fund dollars
Q4 2020–Q3 2021803$16.7B298$20.1B
Q4 2021–Q3 2022786$14.2B399$28.1B
Q4 2022–Q3 2023633$11.2B179$10.3B
Q4 2023–Q3 2024589$9.7B204$11.3B
Q4 2024–Q3 2025568$6.8B246$6.3B
Q4 2025–Q3 2026621$13B391$6.1B

Score breakdown

Development scales each six-year total 0–100 between the smallest and largest ranked metro areas; Growth is each measure’s momentum as a percentile among them.

MeasureSix-year totalDevelopmentLast 2 years vs prior 2Last year vs priorGrowth
Startup raises4,00097.2−3%+9%54.8
Startup dollars raised$71.7B82.7−5%+91%61.3
Venture funds1,71790.7+66%+59%87.1
Venture fund dollars$82.3B88.0−43%−3%32.3

Venture firms headquartered here

From our Venture Capital Fund Index, with commitments that public LPs (Alameda County Employees' Retirement Association (ACERA), Alaska Permanent Fund Corporation (APFC), Alaska Retirement Management Board (ARMB), Andra AP-fonden (AP2), Arkansas Teacher Retirement System (ATRS), CalPERS, CalSTRS, Chicago Teachers' Pension Fund (CTPF), Colorado Public Employees' Retirement Association (Colorado PERA), Connecticut Retirement Plans and Trust Funds (CRPTF), Contra Costa County Employees' Retirement Association (CCCERA), District of Columbia Retirement Board (DCRB), Employees' Retirement System of Rhode Island (ERSRI), Employees' Retirement System of the State of Hawaii (HIERS), Enterprise Ireland (Seed and Venture Capital Scheme), European Investment Fund (EIF), Fire and Police Pension Association of Colorado (FPPA), Greater Manchester Pension Fund (GMPF), Illinois Growth and Innovation Fund (Illinois State Treasurer), International Finance Corporation (IFC), Ireland Strategic Investment Fund, Kentucky Public Pensions Authority (KPPA), KfW Capital, Korea Venture Investment Corp. (Foreign VC Investment Fund), LACERA, Los Angeles City Employees' Retirement System (LACERS), Maine Public Employees Retirement System (MainePERS), Merseyside Pension Fund, Minnesota State Board of Investment, Montana Board of Investments, NYC Board of Education Retirement System (BERS), NYC Employees' Retirement System (NYCERS), NYC Fire Pension Fund, NYC Police Pension Fund, NYC Teachers' Retirement System, Nebraska Investment Council, New Hampshire Retirement System (NHRS), New Jersey Division of Investment, New Mexico Educational Retirement Board (NMERB), New Mexico State Investment Council, New York State Common Retirement Fund, New York Ventures (Empire State Development), New Zealand Superannuation Fund, Norfund (Norwegian Investment Fund for Developing Countries), North Carolina Retirement Systems (NCRS), Orange County Employees Retirement System (OCERS), Oregon Growth Account (Oregon Growth Board), Oregon State Treasury (OPERF), Pennsylvania PSERS, Pennsylvania SERS, Public Employee Retirement System of Idaho (PERSI), Public School and Education Employee Retirement Systems of Missouri (PSRS/PEERS), San Bernardino County Employees' Retirement Association (SBCERA), San Diego County Employees Retirement Association (SDCERA), South Carolina Retirement System Investment Commission (RSIC), South Dakota Investment Council (South Dakota Retirement System), State Universities Retirement System of Illinois (SURS), State of Michigan Retirement System (SMRS), State of Wisconsin Investment Board (SWIB), Teachers' Retirement System of Oklahoma (OTRS), Teachers' Retirement System of the State of Illinois (TRS), Teachers' Retirement System of the State of Kentucky (TRS), Texas Municipal Retirement System, US International Development Finance Corporation (DFC), UTIMCO (Permanent University Fund), University of California, Washington State Investment Board, West Yorkshire Pension Fund (WYPF)) report to each firm’s funds.

FirmHeadquartersLatest fundPublic LP commitments
Insight PartnersNew York$12.5B2025$7.3B92 funds
Thrive CapitalNew York$10B2026$989M10 funds
Tiger Global ManagementNew York$2.2B2022$450M3 funds
Lux CapitalNew York$1.5B2026$412M3 funds
Primary Venture PartnersNew York$625M2026$215M8 funds
Counterpoint GlobalNew York$620M2020—
BoxGroupNew York$550M2025$-0M2 funds
FirstMark CapitalNew York$380M2020$10M9 funds
AlleyCorpNew York$335M2025—
Coatue ManagementNew York$331M2022—
SOSVPrinceton$306M2024$87M4 funds
Boldstart VenturesNew York$250M2024—
Lerer HippeauNew York$200M2025$40M1 fund
Vine VenturesNew York$140M2022—
Conversion CapitalNew York$122M2022—
Third PrimeNew York$88M2024$12M1 fund
TechstarsNew York$80M2022$115M5 funds
Reciprocal VenturesNew York$69M2020—
Bowery CapitalNew York$59M2016—
Valor Capital GroupNew York$57M2018—
4DX VenturesNew York$49M2022$10M1 fund
Strobe VenturesNew York$41M2025—
Female Founders FundNew York$29M2025—
VanEck VenturesNew York$25M2025—
Forum VenturesNew York$22M2025—
XRC VenturesNew York$6.3M2019—
HearstLabNew York——
Union Square VenturesNew York—$335M29 funds

Public LPs report $9.9B committed to 168 funds managed by these firms (all vintages). Commitments aren’t part of the score.

How the index works

Every company and fund raising money privately in the US files a Form D notice with the SEC within 15 days of its first sale. We count each new offering once, in the quarter of its first notice, at the amount sold in its latest amendment. Startup raises are offerings by operating companies in technology, health care, energy, manufacturing, business services, and financial services (excluding banks and debt-only offerings). Venture funds are pooled funds that describe themselves as venture capital funds, excluding single-deal and series vehicles (SPVs) and feeder funds.

Offerings are placed by the issuer’s ZIP code in its combined statistical area, or its metropolitan area where there isn’t one. Addresses shared by 25 or more unrelated issuers (registered agents, fund administrators, mail drops) are left out, because they don’t say where a company works.

Development averages four measures over the whole period: the number of startup raises, the dollars they sold, the number of venture funds, and the dollars they raised. Each is scaled 0–100 on a log scale between the smallest and largest ranked area. Growth averages, for the same four measures, the change in the last two years against the two before and in the last year against the one before, as a percentile among ranked areas. Overall is 70% Development plus 30% Growth. Areas need 150 startup raises and 10 venture funds in the period to be ranked.

Form D undercounts: some issuers never file, and amounts are self-reported. Amounts sold grow as issuers amend their notices, so the latest quarters’ dollars run low until they do. Delaware and Wyoming still include companies that list a smaller registered agent’s address rather than where they work. Firms are placed in a metro by their headquarters city. Data through September 30, 2026. Sources: SEC Form D data sets; US Census Bureau 2020 ZCTA to county relationship file; OMB 2023 metropolitan area delineations (NBER county crosswalk).