Khosla Ventures V
Khosla Ventures Vintage 2014 Reported by University of California
What each LP reports
| LP | As of | Committed | Paid in | Distributed | Remaining value | Net IRR | TVPI | DPI | Paid in vs. value |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| University of California | 2025-06-30 | $60M | $58M | $115M | $80M | 19.9% | 3.37x | 1.98x |
Paid in Distributed Remaining value
2014 vintage in University of California’s portfolio
All 7 funds of vintage 2014 in University of California’s report, ranked by net IRR. Private equity, venture, and other strategies are mixed, so treat this as context rather than a strategy benchmark.
| # | Fund | Net IRR | TVPI | DPI |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Column Group II | 778.3% | 2.40x | 1.88x |
| 2 | H.I.G. Middle Market LBO Fund II | 24.8% | 1.48x | 1.34x |
| 3 | GGV V | 24.2% | 5.00x | 2.83x |
| 4 | Khosla Ventures V | 19.9% | 3.37x | 1.98x |
| 5 | Blackstone Strategic Capital Holdings | 14.5% | 1.88x | 0.71x |
| 6 | H.I.G. Europe Capital Partners II | 10.1% | 1.29x | 0.97x |
| 7 | Sycamore Partners II | 3.8% | 1.17x | 0.63x |
Other reported funds by this firm
About this data
University of California: UC Regents Private Equity Investments (Alternative Investments: Private Equity Internal Rates of Return), as of June 30, 2025. Net IRR and total value multiple as reported by the UC Regents; IRRs are calculated by a third-party service provider from UC's own cash flows and may differ from the GP's. Vintage year is based on first cash flow. Funds in their first three years are reported as NM (shown as blank). Active partnerships only; exited funds are not listed. View source
Figures are as each LP reports them for its own investment, so they can differ between LPs because of timing, fees, and share class. Not investment advice.