Hottub VC
Join free

Khosla Ventures

Also known as KV

Menlo Park, United States Founded 2004 khoslaventures.com San Francisco Bay Area ecosystem (#1 of 32)

  • Seed
  • Early stage
  • Growth
  • AI
  • climate
  • healthcare
  • robotics
  • fintech

Khosla Ventures’s latest fund is 2025 fund family (seed, venture, opportunity): $4B, 2025, #12 of 427 firms by latest fund.

Find LPs that back firms like this Claim this page

Latest fund$4B2025
Rank by latest fund#12of 427 firms
Assets under managementNot reported
Funds with reported performance31From public LP disclosures
Funds raised, by the year each closed
Funds raised, by the year each closedFunds raised, by the year each closed. 2023: $3B; 2025: $4B.2023 · Raised: $3B$3B20232025 · Raised: $4B$4B2025
The numbers
YearRaised
2023$3B
2025$4B

Overview

The 2025 close (about $4B, roughly 17 months before July 2026) comes from Bloomberg reporting via Pulse 2. The exact close date and breakdown were not confirmed. In July 2026 Bloomberg reported talks for up to $5.5B more, not closed as of Sept 2026. 2023 breakdown: $500M seed, $1.6B venture, $900M growth.

Funds

FundClosedSizeSource
2025 fund family (seed, venture, opportunity)2025$4B~US$4Bpulse2.com
2023 fund family (seed, KV VIII, opportunity)2023$3B~US$3Bnews.crunchbase.com

LPs on the record

12 private foundations list on their latest IRS Form 990-PF, and 17 other LPs report holding Khosla Ventures’s funds.

26 more LPs are in the app. Find LPs that back firms like this one in Hottub’s LP Intelligence: ranked by overlap, with what each holds and how to reach it.

Firms whose LPs overlap

The firms sharing the most LPs on record with Khosla Ventures, relative to how many LPs each has. A peer set like this is what Find LPs ranks LPs from.

Find LPs for Khosla Ventures and these firms: Hottub ranks the LPs that hold their funds, the ones still adding funds first.

Track record

A score of 59 out of 100 from 5 of the 17 funds public LPs report, 4 of them in the top half of their vintage. Its ranked funds’ median TVPI is 1.26x and median DPI 0.00x. Pooled where reports give cash flows: 1.70x TVPI, 0.43x DPI. That ranks it 40th of 123 managers with a score.

Each fund once, as the latest of 7 LPs’ reports ranks it by TVPI against funds of the same vintage in those reports; 50 is the median fund, and a short record is pulled toward 50. The full record in LP Intelligence, with each fund’s rank and what usually follows a fund like its latest, or every manager’s.

Reported fund performance

As reported by public LPs that invested in these funds, net of fees. “Versus vintage” ranks each fund against every other fund of the same vintage in that LP’s report, mostly private equity and venture funds. Open a fund for its cash flows and full peer ranking.

FundVintageNet IRRVersus vintage (IRR)TVPIDPIReported by
Khosla Ventures IX2025N/MNot yet meaningful0.98x0.00xNew Jersey Division of Investment, New Mexico State Investment Council
Khosla Ventures Opportunity III2025N/MNot yet meaningful1.13x0.00xNew Jersey Division of Investment, New Mexico State Investment Council
Khosla Ventures Seed G2025N/MNot yet meaningful1.01x0.00xNew Jersey Division of Investment, New Mexico State Investment Council
Khosla Ventures Opportunity II2023N/MNot yet meaningful1.26x0.00xNew Jersey Division of Investment, New Mexico State Investment Council
Khosla Ventures Seed F2023N/MNot yet meaningful1.17x0.00xNew Jersey Division of Investment, New Mexico State Investment Council
Khosla Ventures VIII2023N/MNot yet meaningful1.69x0.00xNew Jersey Division of Investment, New Mexico State Investment Council
Khosla Ventures Seed D201819.3%Second quartile #4 of 9 2018 funds · median 19.2%2.35x—Alameda County Employees' Retirement Association (ACERA)
Khosla Ventures VI201822.7%Top quartile #2 of 9 2018 funds · median 19.2%2.66x—Alameda County Employees' Retirement Association (ACERA)
Khosla Ventures V201419.9%Third quartile #4 of 7 2014 funds · median 19.9%3.37x1.98xUniversity of California
Khosla Ventures IV2012N/MNot yet meaningful4.03x3.54xNew Jersey Division of Investment
Khosla Ventures Seed B201218.0%Top quartile #1 of 4 2012 funds · median 9.5%3.55x3.21xUniversity of California, Alameda County Employees' Retirement Association (ACERA)
Khosla Ventures V201220.8%Top quartile #2 of 10 2012 funds · median 13.3%3.45x—Alameda County Employees' Retirement Association (ACERA)
Khosla Ventures IV201121.9%Second quartile #3 of 11 2011 funds · median 13.0%4.04x3.53xLos Angeles City Employees' Retirement System (LACERS), University of California, Alameda County Employees' Retirement Association (ACERA)
Khosla Ventures III200910.1%Second quartile #3 of 6 2009 funds · median 8.8%1.90x—Alameda County Employees' Retirement Association (ACERA)
Khosla Ventures Seed20091.4%Too few peers to rank1.18x0.21xUniversity of California, Alameda County Employees' Retirement Association (ACERA)
Khosla Ventures III—N/MNot yet meaningful——Andra AP-fonden (AP2), State of Michigan Retirement System (SMRS)
Khosla Ventures IV—N/MNot yet meaningful——Andra AP-fonden (AP2), State of Michigan Retirement System (SMRS)
Khosla Ventures IX—N/MNot yet meaningful——Andra AP-fonden (AP2), State of Michigan Retirement System (SMRS)
Khosla Ventures Opportunity I—N/MNot yet meaningful——State of Michigan Retirement System (SMRS)
Khosla Ventures Opportunity II—N/MNot yet meaningful——State of Michigan Retirement System (SMRS)
Khosla Ventures Opportunity III—N/MNot yet meaningful——State of Michigan Retirement System (SMRS)
Khosla Ventures Seed B—N/MNot yet meaningful——Andra AP-fonden (AP2)
Khosla Ventures Seed C—N/MNot yet meaningful——Andra AP-fonden (AP2)
Khosla Ventures Seed D—N/MNot yet meaningful——State of Michigan Retirement System (SMRS)
Khosla Ventures Seed E—N/MNot yet meaningful——Andra AP-fonden (AP2), State of Michigan Retirement System (SMRS)
Khosla Ventures Seed F—N/MNot yet meaningful——Andra AP-fonden (AP2), State of Michigan Retirement System (SMRS)
Khosla Ventures Seed G—N/MNot yet meaningful——Andra AP-fonden (AP2), State of Michigan Retirement System (SMRS)
Khosla Ventures V—N/MNot yet meaningful——Andra AP-fonden (AP2), State of Michigan Retirement System (SMRS)
Khosla Ventures VI—N/MNot yet meaningful——Andra AP-fonden (AP2), State of Michigan Retirement System (SMRS)
Khosla Ventures VII—N/MNot yet meaningful——Andra AP-fonden (AP2), State of Michigan Retirement System (SMRS)
Khosla Ventures VIII—N/MNot yet meaningful——Andra AP-fonden (AP2), State of Michigan Retirement System (SMRS)

Alameda County Employees' Retirement Association (ACERA): ACERA Annual Report on Alternative Investments (Government Code Section 7514.7 Disclosures Chart), as of December 31, 2024. From the Alternative Investment Vehicle (AIV) Disclosures Chart that ACERA staff present to the Investment Committee each December under California Government Code Section 7514.7, for the period ending 2024-12-31 (ACERA's fiscal year is the calendar year). The chart says it is prepared by ACERA from its own records and the fund managers' reports and has not been prepared, reviewed or approved by the fund managers. Net IRR is the chart's "Net IRR (Since Inception)" and TVPI its "Investment Multiple (Since Inception)", both as printed; for 36 funds the printed multiple differs from (Cash Distributions + NAV) / Cash Contributions, and DPI is left blank. Amounts are whole US dollars as printed: Commitment, "Cash Contributions (Since Inception)", and "Cash Distributions", which the chart heads "(FY 2024)" on a fiscal-year-end basis and which are cumulative to that date; total value is the printed "Cash Distributions + NAV". Vintage is the chart's "Vintage Year". 3 recent commitments with no NAV yet ("N/A") have only a commitment; 7 funds have no Net IRR ("N/A"), and for 4 more the chart gives a time-weighted return instead of an IRR, which is left blank. The chart lists all 115 alternative investment vehicles together and does not separate asset classes, so besides private equity and venture funds it includes private credit, real estate, infrastructure and other real assets funds; all are included as listed. 46 funds contracted before 2017 are not required to report under Section 7514.7 and are shown where the manager shared the information voluntarily. View source

Andra AP-fonden (AP2): AP2 holdings: Non-listed equities, participations and loans, as of December 31, 2025. AP2 lists each fund it holds at the year end with a country, an asset class and one amount, its "Acquisition value" in whole millions of Swedish kronor. AP2 does not define that amount: it is not a commitment and not a current value, and AP2 does not say whether capital a fund has returned is taken off it. No amount is stored here for that reason: this is a list of the funds AP2 holds, by name, and the amounts are in AP2's own list (the source). AP2 reports no commitment, fair value, distributions, vintage year, multiple or IRR per fund. Included are the 201 lines AP2 classes as "Private equity" among its "Other non-listed" Swedish and foreign holdings (acquisition values adding up to SEK 45749 million; the list prints no total); they include venture, growth, buyout, fund-of-funds and co-investment vehicles, and a few funds whose names say they lend. The 47 lines AP2 classes as private credits, real estate, sustainable infrastructure or natural climate solutions are left out, as are the 12 lines of its associated companies and loans. View source

Los Angeles City Employees' Retirement System (LACERS): LACERS Private Equity Portfolio Performance Report, as of December 31, 2025. "Net IRR" and "Net TVPI" as printed in the fund-by-fund appendix of the Private Equity Portfolio Performance Report that LACERS posts semiannually (prepared on its private equity consultant's template; the cover gives www.aksia.com). The report defines TVPI as (cumulative distributions + fair market value) / cumulative contributions and labels IRRs of investments held less than two years "n.m."; 27 funds have no IRR (n.m., or "-" in the report) and 14 have no multiple ("-", mostly commitments with nothing contributed yet), all shown as blank. Dollar amounts are whole US dollars as reported (inception-to-date contributions and distributions). Total value = distributions + fair market value, and DPI = distributions / contributions, are computed. All 408 partnerships in the report are included: 305 active and 103 liquidated (no remaining fair market value), of which 23 are in LACERS' Specialized Portfolio and the rest in its Core Portfolio. LACERS counts 36 Credit/Distressed and 15 Natural Resources (energy) partnerships as private equity in this report, alongside buyout, growth equity, venture capital, secondaries, co-investment and fund-of-funds vehicles; its separate private credit and real estate reports are not imported. View source

State of Michigan Retirement System (SMRS): State of Michigan Investment Board Report: SMRS Private Equity, Net Market Value by Entity, as of December 31, 2025. The State of Michigan Investment Board lists each private equity entity with only two amounts, an "Adjusted Reported Value" (shown here as the market value, in whole dollars as printed) and an "Unfunded Commitment" (not shown). It reports no commitment amount, contributions, distributions, vintage year, multiple or IRR per fund, so committed, paid-in, distributed, total value, IRR, TVPI and DPI are blank; nothing is derived or estimated. The report does not define how the reported value is adjusted. Every entity in the Private Equity table is included as classified by the Board (buyout, growth, venture, secondaries, co-investment and separate-account vehicles); the Real Estate and Infrastructure, Real Return and Opportunistic, and Absolute Return tables are not imported. The entities add up to the Board's printed Total of $24,750,150,762 reported value and $7,378,170,291 unfunded; its "Short Term Investments and Other" and "Income Accruals" lines are not funds and are left out. 4 entities are marked by the Board as new commitments made during the quarter. View source

New Jersey Division of Investment: New Jersey Division of Investment Reporting Package: Alternative Investments, Common Pension Funds E and A (Private Equity), as of May 31, 2026. The Division's schedule has no IRR column, so IRR is blank. TVPI is the Division's printed Total Value Multiple (total value / amount contributed; blank where nothing has been contributed) and total value is its Total Value column (current market value + total distributed); DPI = total distributed / amount contributed is computed. Per the Division: amount contributed is not adjusted for recallable distributions and includes returned unused capital; total distributed includes recallable proceeds; market values are the most recent quarterly values reported by the general partners, adjusted for cash flows through month-end. The Division lists an inception date rather than a vintage year; its year is used as the vintage (blank for 1 fund listed without one). 11 euro-denominated funds are shown in US dollars at the Division's month-end exchange rate. Private Equity sections of both schedules as classified by the Division (including co-investment, secondaries, distressed and mezzanine vehicles); Private Credit, Real Estate, Real Assets and Hedge Funds are not imported. Strategy subtotals and parent rows of multi-tranche vehicles are not imported; each tranche is listed. The Division's subtotals include commitments that it does not list as rows, which are therefore missing here: $600,000,000 under "Distressed Debt" in Common Pension Fund E. View source

New Mexico State Investment Council: New Mexico State Investment Council Private Equity Performance Updates: Fund Summaries (Active Funds), as of March 31, 2026. Net IRR and net multiple since inception as printed in the fund summaries of the quarterly performance updates that Mercer prepares for the Council (data source given as Invient), published in the Council's public meeting materials. The fund summaries head the two columns "Net" (Multiple, IRR); their total rows equal the "Net Multiple" and "Net IRR" of active commitments in the reports' dashboards. The net multiple is used as TVPI. The fund summaries give only committed capital, exposure (NAV + unfunded), net multiple and IRR for each fund, so contributions, distributions, total value and DPI are blank; contributions and distributions are reported by program and strategy only. Committed capital is reported in $ millions to one decimal and converted to whole dollars. Vintage year is defined by the reports as the year of the fund's first cash flow. 27 of the newest funds are marked N/A or NM (not defined in the reports) and lack an IRR, a multiple or both. The IRR of The Veritas Capital Fund IX, L.P. is printed as "#######" (not readable) and is blank. Frazier Healthcare Growth Buyout Fund XI, L.P. is printed with a negative multiple, imported as printed. Two reports are combined: the National Private Equity Program (175 active funds, $11,121.7 million committed; 32 Venture Capital, 93 Buyout, 33 Growth, 17 Special Situations) and the Strategic Venture Capital Program and New Mexico Private Equity Investment Program (Legacy) (83 active funds, $2,346.3 million committed; 76 Fund Investments, 5 Co-Investment Funds, 1 Catalyst Fund, 1 Recovery Fund). The second report covers the Council's New Mexico-focused venture and private equity commitments, including its own co-investment, catalyst and recovery vehicles. Active funds only: liquidated and sold funds are reported in aggregate, not by fund. The Private Debt, Real Estate and Real Assets reports in the same materials are not imported. View source

University of California: UC Regents Private Equity Investments (Alternative Investments: Private Equity Internal Rates of Return), as of June 30, 2025. Net IRR and total value multiple as reported by the UC Regents; IRRs are calculated by a third-party service provider from UC's own cash flows and may differ from the GP's. Vintage year is based on first cash flow. Funds in their first three years are reported as NM (shown as blank). Active partnerships only; exited funds are not listed. View source

About this data

Fund sizes come from firm announcements, SEC filings, and press reports, converted to US dollars near the closing date. Compiled as of October 9, 2026. Notable portfolio companies are examples from public sources, not a complete list.

  1. pulse2.com/khosla-ventures-reportedly-in-talks-to-raise-5…
  2. news.crunchbase.com/venture/khosla-ventures-funds-openai-dd2

Share this page

For a post, a deck, or a note to your partners: image (PNG) · vector (SVG).