Hottub VC
Join free

Khosla Ventures IV

Khosla Ventures Vintage 2011 Reported by Los Angeles City Employees' Retirement System (LACERS), University of California, Alameda County Employees' Retirement Association (ACERA)

Net IRR21.9%Los Angeles City Employees' Retirement System (LACERS), as of December 31, 2025
TVPI4.04xTotal value / paid-in
DPI3.53xDistributions / paid-in
Versus vintageQ2Second quartile · #3 of 11

What each LP reports

LPAs ofCommittedPaid inDistributedRemaining valueNet IRRTVPIDPIPaid in vs. value
Los Angeles City Employees' Retirement System (LACERS)2025-12-31$20M$20M$69M$9.9M21.9%4.04x3.53x
University of California2025-06-30$60M$59M$187M$53M22.0%4.07x3.17x
Alameda County Employees' Retirement Association (ACERA)2024-12-31$15M$15M$47M$16M22.5%4.23x—

Paid in Distributed Remaining value

2011 vintage in Los Angeles City Employees' Retirement System (LACERS)’s portfolio

All 11 funds of vintage 2011 in Los Angeles City Employees' Retirement System (LACERS)’s report, ranked by net IRR. Private equity, venture, and other strategies are mixed, so treat this as context rather than a strategy benchmark.

Hellman & Friedman Capital Partners VII: 24.5%Spark Capital III: 23.9%Khosla Ventures IV: 21.9%TPG Growth II: 16.5%Green Equity Investors VI: 13.7%Vista Equity Partners Fund IV: 13.0%Blackstone Capital Partners VI: 12.0%Blackstone Energy Partners: 11.3%BC European Capital IX: 9.8%Avenue Europe Special Situations Fund II: 3.5%Hony Capital Fund V: -3.7%-3.7%24.5%
#FundNet IRRTVPIDPI
1Hellman & Friedman Capital Partners VII24.5%3.36x3.30x
2Spark Capital III23.9%3.40x1.77x
3Khosla Ventures IV21.9%4.04x3.53x
4TPG Growth II16.5%2.40x1.99x
5Green Equity Investors VI13.7%2.40x1.97x
6Vista Equity Partners Fund IV13.0%2.17x1.41x
7Blackstone Capital Partners VI12.0%1.91x1.72x
8Blackstone Energy Partners11.3%1.80x1.65x
9BC European Capital IX9.8%1.63x1.40x
10Avenue Europe Special Situations Fund II3.5%1.14x1.14x
11Hony Capital Fund V-3.7%0.73x0.46x

2011 vintage in University of California’s portfolio

All 3 funds of vintage 2011 in University of California’s report, ranked by net IRR. Private equity, venture, and other strategies are mixed, so treat this as context rather than a strategy benchmark.

Sycamore Partners: 22.7%Khosla Ventures IV: 22.0%GGV IV: 8.3%8.3%22.7%
#FundNet IRRTVPIDPI
1Sycamore Partners22.7%1.96x1.51x
2Khosla Ventures IV22.0%4.07x3.17x
3GGV IV8.3%1.73x1.68x

2011 vintage in Alameda County Employees' Retirement Association (ACERA)’s portfolio

All 4 funds of vintage 2011 in Alameda County Employees' Retirement Association (ACERA)’s report, ranked by net IRR. Private equity, venture, and other strategies are mixed, so treat this as context rather than a strategy benchmark.

General Catalyst Group VI, L.P.: 29.2%Khosla Ventures IV, L.P.: 22.5%ABRY Advanced Securities Fund II, L.P.: 13.0%ABRY Partners VII, L.P.: 12.1%12.1%29.2%
#FundNet IRRTVPIDPI
1General Catalyst Group VI, L.P.29.2%6.80x—
2Khosla Ventures IV, L.P.22.5%4.23x—
3ABRY Advanced Securities Fund II, L.P.13.0%1.83x—
4ABRY Partners VII, L.P.12.1%1.70x—

Other reported funds by this firm

FundVintageNet IRRTVPIVersus vintage
Khosla Ventures IX2025N/M0.98x
Khosla Ventures Opportunity III2025N/M1.13x
Khosla Ventures Seed G2025N/M1.01x
Khosla Ventures Opportunity II2023N/M1.26x
Khosla Ventures Seed F2023N/M1.17x
Khosla Ventures VIII2023N/M1.69x
Khosla Ventures Seed D201819.3%2.35xSecond quartile
Khosla Ventures VI201822.7%2.66xTop quartile
Khosla Ventures V201419.9%3.37xThird quartile
Khosla Ventures IV2012N/M4.03x
Khosla Ventures Seed B201218.0%3.55xTop quartile
Khosla Ventures V201220.8%3.45xTop quartile
Khosla Ventures III200910.1%1.90xSecond quartile
Khosla Ventures Seed20091.4%1.18x
Khosla Ventures III—N/M—
Khosla Ventures IV—N/M—
Khosla Ventures IX—N/M—
Khosla Ventures Opportunity I—N/M—
Khosla Ventures Opportunity II—N/M—
Khosla Ventures Opportunity III—N/M—
Khosla Ventures Seed B—N/M—
Khosla Ventures Seed C—N/M—
Khosla Ventures Seed D—N/M—
Khosla Ventures Seed E—N/M—
Khosla Ventures Seed F—N/M—
Khosla Ventures Seed G—N/M—
Khosla Ventures V—N/M—
Khosla Ventures VI—N/M—
Khosla Ventures VII—N/M—
Khosla Ventures VIII—N/M—

About this data

Los Angeles City Employees' Retirement System (LACERS): LACERS Private Equity Portfolio Performance Report, as of December 31, 2025. "Net IRR" and "Net TVPI" as printed in the fund-by-fund appendix of the Private Equity Portfolio Performance Report that LACERS posts semiannually (prepared on its private equity consultant's template; the cover gives www.aksia.com). The report defines TVPI as (cumulative distributions + fair market value) / cumulative contributions and labels IRRs of investments held less than two years "n.m."; 27 funds have no IRR (n.m., or "-" in the report) and 14 have no multiple ("-", mostly commitments with nothing contributed yet), all shown as blank. Dollar amounts are whole US dollars as reported (inception-to-date contributions and distributions). Total value = distributions + fair market value, and DPI = distributions / contributions, are computed. All 408 partnerships in the report are included: 305 active and 103 liquidated (no remaining fair market value), of which 23 are in LACERS' Specialized Portfolio and the rest in its Core Portfolio. LACERS counts 36 Credit/Distressed and 15 Natural Resources (energy) partnerships as private equity in this report, alongside buyout, growth equity, venture capital, secondaries, co-investment and fund-of-funds vehicles; its separate private credit and real estate reports are not imported. View source

University of California: UC Regents Private Equity Investments (Alternative Investments: Private Equity Internal Rates of Return), as of June 30, 2025. Net IRR and total value multiple as reported by the UC Regents; IRRs are calculated by a third-party service provider from UC's own cash flows and may differ from the GP's. Vintage year is based on first cash flow. Funds in their first three years are reported as NM (shown as blank). Active partnerships only; exited funds are not listed. View source

Alameda County Employees' Retirement Association (ACERA): ACERA Annual Report on Alternative Investments (Government Code Section 7514.7 Disclosures Chart), as of December 31, 2024. From the Alternative Investment Vehicle (AIV) Disclosures Chart that ACERA staff present to the Investment Committee each December under California Government Code Section 7514.7, for the period ending 2024-12-31 (ACERA's fiscal year is the calendar year). The chart says it is prepared by ACERA from its own records and the fund managers' reports and has not been prepared, reviewed or approved by the fund managers. Net IRR is the chart's "Net IRR (Since Inception)" and TVPI its "Investment Multiple (Since Inception)", both as printed; for 36 funds the printed multiple differs from (Cash Distributions + NAV) / Cash Contributions, and DPI is left blank. Amounts are whole US dollars as printed: Commitment, "Cash Contributions (Since Inception)", and "Cash Distributions", which the chart heads "(FY 2024)" on a fiscal-year-end basis and which are cumulative to that date; total value is the printed "Cash Distributions + NAV". Vintage is the chart's "Vintage Year". 3 recent commitments with no NAV yet ("N/A") have only a commitment; 7 funds have no Net IRR ("N/A"), and for 4 more the chart gives a time-weighted return instead of an IRR, which is left blank. The chart lists all 115 alternative investment vehicles together and does not separate asset classes, so besides private equity and venture funds it includes private credit, real estate, infrastructure and other real assets funds; all are included as listed. 46 funds contracted before 2017 are not required to report under Section 7514.7 and are shown where the manager shared the information voluntarily. View source

Figures are as each LP reports them for its own investment, so they can differ between LPs because of timing, fees, and share class. Not investment advice.