New Enterprise Associates 17
New Enterprise Associates Vintage 2019 Reported by Employees' Retirement System of the State of Hawaii (HIERS), Los Angeles City Employees' Retirement System (LACERS), Alaska Permanent Fund Corporation (APFC), CalSTRS, Nebraska Investment Council
What each LP reports
| LP | As of | Committed | Paid in | Distributed | Remaining value | Net IRR | TVPI | DPI | Paid in vs. value |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Employees' Retirement System of the State of Hawaii (HIERS) | 2026-03-31 | $35M | $31M | — | — | N/M | — | — | |
| Los Angeles City Employees' Retirement System (LACERS) | 2025-12-31 | $35M | $31M | $6M | $36M | 7.3% | 1.34x | 0.19x | |
| Alaska Permanent Fund Corporation (APFC) | 2025-12-31 | $30M | — | — | — | N/M | — | — | |
| CalSTRS | 2025-06-30 | $225M | $200M | $32M | $202M | 4.5% | 1.17x | 0.16x | |
| Nebraska Investment Council | 2024-12-31 | $50M | $43M | $5.3M | $44M | 4.7% | 1.17x | 0.12x |
Paid in Distributed Remaining value
2019 vintage in Employees' Retirement System of the State of Hawaii (HIERS)’s portfolio
All 17 funds of vintage 2019 in Employees' Retirement System of the State of Hawaii (HIERS)’s report, ranked by net IRR. Private equity, venture, and other strategies are mixed, so treat this as context rather than a strategy benchmark.
| # | Fund | Net IRR | TVPI | DPI |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| — | Advent International GPE IX, L.P. | N/M | — | — |
| — | American Securities Partners VIII, L.P. | N/M | — | — |
| — | Genstar Capital Partners IX, L.P. | N/M | — | — |
| — | Hellman & Friedman Capital Partners IX, L.P. | N/M | — | — |
| — | Jade Equity Investors, L.P. | N/M | — | — |
| — | New Enterprise Associates 17, L.P. | N/M | — | — |
| — | Oak HC/FT Partners III, L.P. | N/M | — | — |
| — | Oaktree Special Situations Fund II, L.P. | N/M | — | — |
| — | Platinum Equity Capital Partners V, L.P. | N/M | — | — |
| — | Polaris Partners IX, L.P. | N/M | — | — |
| — | Sentinel Capital Partners VI, L.P. | N/M | — | — |
| — | TA XIII, L.P. | N/M | — | — |
| — | Vista Equity Partners Fund VII, L.P. | N/M | — | — |
| — | Arsenal III, L.P. | N/M | — | — |
| — | Blue Ventures III, L.P. | N/M | — | — |
| — | Moment Ventures Fund II, L.P. | N/M | — | — |
| — | Threshold Ventures III, L.P. | N/M | — | — |
2019 vintage in Los Angeles City Employees' Retirement System (LACERS)’s portfolio
All 20 funds of vintage 2019 in Los Angeles City Employees' Retirement System (LACERS)’s report, ranked by net IRR. Private equity, venture, and other strategies are mixed, so treat this as context rather than a strategy benchmark.
| # | Fund | Net IRR | TVPI | DPI |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Genstar Capital Partners IX | 25.3% | 2.25x | 1.07x |
| 2 | Defy Partners II | 24.5% | 2.48x | 0.00x |
| 3 | TCV X | 23.3% | 3.05x | 0.75x |
| 4 | OceanSound Partners Fund | 21.3% | 2.01x | 0.55x |
| 5 | TA XIII-A | 21.0% | 2.00x | 0.73x |
| 6 | Genstar IX Opportunities Fund I | 20.0% | 2.15x | 1.05x |
| 7 | American Securities Partners VIII | 17.3% | 1.79x | 0.65x |
| 8 | Glendon Opportunities Fund II | 16.5% | 1.87x | 1.19x |
| 9 | KPS Special Situations Mid-Cap Fund | 13.8% | 1.49x | 0.43x |
| 10 | Hellman & Friedman Capital Partners IX | 13.4% | 1.77x | 0.21x |
| 11 | Advent International GPE IX | 12.3% | 1.60x | 0.38x |
| 12 | Harvest Partners VIII | 11.4% | 1.50x | 0.57x |
| 13 | ABRY Partners IX | 11.2% | 1.48x | 0.49x |
| 14 | Astorg VII | 10.6% | 1.53x | 0.63x |
| 15 | FS Equity Partners VIII | 10.0% | 1.50x | 0.38x |
| 16 | Oak HC-FT Partners III | 9.5% | 1.53x | 0.09x |
| 17 | Platinum Equity Capital Partners V | 8.6% | 1.38x | 0.37x |
| 18 | Advent Global Technology | 8.2% | 1.43x | 0.14x |
| 19 | New Enterprise Associates 17 | 7.3% | 1.34x | 0.19x |
| 20 | Gilde Buy-Out Fund VI | 4.1% | 1.13x | 0.24x |
2019 vintage in Alaska Permanent Fund Corporation (APFC)’s portfolio
All 29 funds of vintage 2019 in Alaska Permanent Fund Corporation (APFC)’s report, ranked by net IRR. Private equity, venture, and other strategies are mixed, so treat this as context rather than a strategy benchmark.
| # | Fund | Net IRR | TVPI | DPI |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| — | Advent International GPE IX Limited Partnership | N/M | — | — |
| — | Alaska Future Fund LP | N/M | — | — |
| — | Altas Partners Holdings II LP | N/M | — | — |
| — | Altitude Life Science Ventures Side Fund III LP | N/M | — | — |
| — | Ara Fund I LP | N/M | — | — |
| — | Bain Capital Asia Fund IV LP | N/M | — | — |
| — | Clearlake Opportunities Partners II LP | N/M | — | — |
| — | Dawson Portfolio Finance 3 LP | N/M | — | — |
| — | DCM IX LP | N/M | — | — |
| — | Genstar Capital Partners IX LP | N/M | — | — |
| — | HIG Growth Buyouts & Equity Fund III LP | N/M | — | — |
| — | HIG Middle Market LBO Fund III LP | N/M | — | — |
| — | Harvest Partners VIII LP | N/M | — | — |
| — | Hellman & Friedman Capital Partners IX LP | N/M | — | — |
| — | Incline Elevate Fund LP | N/M | — | — |
| — | L Catterton Growth IV LP | N/M | — | — |
| — | Lee Equity Partners Fund III LP | N/M | — | — |
| — | Lightspeed China Partners IV LP | N/M | — | — |
| — | Lightspeed China Partners Select I LP | N/M | — | — |
| — | Nautic Partners IX LP | N/M | — | — |
| — | New Enterprise Associates 17 LP | N/M | — | — |
| — | One Equity Partners VII LP | N/M | — | — |
| — | Ridgemont Equity Partners III LP | N/M | — | — |
| — | Summit Partners Growth Equity Fund X-A LP | N/M | — | — |
| — | TA XIII-A LP | N/M | — | — |
| — | TCV X LP | N/M | — | — |
| — | Thoma Bravo Fund XIII LP | N/M | — | — |
| — | Vista Equity Endeavor Fund II LP | N/M | — | — |
| — | Vista Equity Partners Fund VII LP | N/M | — | — |
2019 vintage in CalSTRS’s portfolio
All 35 funds of vintage 2019 in CalSTRS’s report, ranked by net IRR. Private equity, venture, and other strategies are mixed, so treat this as context rather than a strategy benchmark.
| # | Fund | Net IRR | TVPI | DPI |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Spectrum VIII-A Discretionary Overage Program | 91.3% | 2.98x | 2.40x |
| 2 | Olympus Growth Fund VII, L.P. | 26.4% | 2.04x | 1.00x |
| 3 | Lone Star Fund XI, L.P. | 25.1% | 1.58x | 0.89x |
| 4 | TCV X, L.P. | 22.9% | 2.75x | 0.56x |
| 5 | Thoma Bravo Fund XIII, L.P. | 22.6% | 1.98x | 1.01x |
| 6 | JMI Equity Fund IX-A, L.P. | 22.5% | 2.13x | 0.92x |
| 7 | TA XIII-A, L.P. | 22.4% | 1.90x | 0.75x |
| 8 | Littlejohn Fund VI, L.P. | 21.6% | 1.70x | 0.44x |
| 9 | Strategic Partners VIII | 21.6% | 1.58x | 0.84x |
| 10 | WCAS XIII, L.P. | 18.7% | 1.61x | 0.63x |
| 11 | Triton Fund V, L.P. | 18.4% | 1.69x | 0.48x |
| 12 | Cortec Group Fund VII, L.P. | 18.4% | 1.68x | 0.60x |
| 13 | TPG Partners VIII, L.P. | 17.2% | 1.56x | 0.41x |
| 14 | Alchemy Special Opportunities Fund IV L.P. | 15.8% | 1.56x | 0.25x |
| 15 | Apollo Investment Fund IX, L.P. | 15.4% | 1.51x | 0.57x |
| 16 | OrbiMed Royalty & Credit Opportunities III, LP | 15.1% | 1.20x | 0.95x |
| 17 | Advent International GPE IX, L.P. | 14.8% | 1.66x | 0.29x |
| 18 | SSG Capital Partners V, L.P. | 14.3% | 1.15x | 1.07x |
| 19 | FCO MA V L.P. | 13.1% | 1.29x | 0.83x |
| 20 | Onex Partners V, L.P. | 12.0% | 1.50x | 0.17x |
| 21 | TPG Asia VII (A), L.P. | 11.2% | 1.46x | 0.64x |
| 22 | Sixth Street Opportunities Partners IV (A), L.P. | 10.9% | 1.49x | 0.60x |
| 23 | Sixth Street Cap Solutions (A) | 10.5% | 1.47x | 0.78x |
| 24 | Blackstone Tactical Opportunities Fund II-S (Surge) L.P. | 9.0% | 1.38x | 0.45x |
| 25 | GGV Discovery II L.P. | 8.7% | 1.49x | 0.00x |
| 26 | PAG Asia III LP | 8.1% | 1.30x | 0.31x |
| 27 | Permira Growth Opportunities I L.P.1 | 8.0% | 1.31x | 0.25x |
| 28 | Siris Partners IV, L.P. | 8.0% | 1.31x | 0.35x |
| 29 | Vista Equity Endeavor II | 8.0% | 1.23x | 0.12x |
| 30 | Arsenal Capital Partners V, L.P. | 6.8% | 1.33x | 0.31x |
| 31 | LAV Biosciences Fund V, L.P. | 6.6% | 1.30x | 0.33x |
| 32 | New Enterprise Associates 17, L.P. | 4.5% | 1.17x | 0.16x |
| 33 | GGV Capital VII Plus L.P. | 4.2% | 1.23x | 0.11x |
| 34 | GGV Capital VII L.P. | 2.1% | 1.11x | 0.05x |
| 35 | Carlyle Europe Partners V, S.C.Sp. | -3.5% | 0.91x | 0.21x |
2019 vintage in Nebraska Investment Council’s portfolio
All 4 funds of vintage 2019 in Nebraska Investment Council’s report, ranked by net IRR. Private equity, venture, and other strategies are mixed, so treat this as context rather than a strategy benchmark.
| # | Fund | Net IRR | TVPI | DPI |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Genstar Capital Partners IX, L.P. | 27.5% | 2.16x | 0.74x |
| 2 | Dover Street X, L.P. | 19.6% | 1.51x | 0.40x |
| 3 | Dover Street X, L.P. (Endowment Portfolio) | 19.5% | 1.51x | 0.40x |
| 4 | New Enterprise Associates 17, L.P. | 4.7% | 1.17x | 0.12x |
Other reported funds by this firm
About this data
Employees' Retirement System of the State of Hawaii (HIERS): HIERS Private Equity Partnerships: Performance Summary by Investment, as of March 31, 2026. ERS posts a quarterly "Performance Summary by Investment" of its private equity partnerships in which only "Capital Committed", "Paid-In Capital" and "Reported Market Value" (with the date of that value) are filled in; the Capital Distributed, Remaining Cost, Net IRR and TVM columns are empty in the published version. So committed, paid-in and market value are shown, in whole US dollars as printed, and distributed, total value, IRR, TVPI and DPI are blank; nothing is derived or estimated. The report says paid-in capital includes both commitment and non-commitment reducing capital calls, that cash flows are HIERS' actual cash paid and received, and that market values reflect HIERS' unrealized interest in each investment. "Vintage Year" is as printed. All 371 investments are included as ERS classifies them by strategy (61 Buyout - Large, 42 Buyout - Mega, 59 Buyout - Mid, 13 Buyout - Small, 3 Co/Direct Investment, 6 Distressed Debt, 40 Growth Equity, 10 Mezzanine, 2 Secondaries, 10 Special Situations, 125 Venture Capital), in the report's blocks: Core (334), Stafford Capital Management - 1 (8), Stafford Capital Management - 2 (11), Stafford Capital Management - 3 (17), Stafford Ho'oulu Fund (1); the Stafford Capital Management blocks list the partnerships held through the Hawaii Targeted Investment Program funds (HiTIP I, II and III) that ERS's Holdings page also reports separately. They add up to the printed Grand Total of $8,371,769,464 committed, $6,707,086,129 paid in and $5,197,639,074 reported market value. 114 investments have no remaining value (liquidated, or not yet called), shown as 0; 9 others carry a value dated before the report date. Each page of the report carries the legend "Institutional Use Only/Not for Public Use | Proprietary and Confidential"; this is the version ERS itself posts on its Holdings page. ERS's separate private credit, real assets and timber reports are not imported. View source
Los Angeles City Employees' Retirement System (LACERS): LACERS Private Equity Portfolio Performance Report, as of December 31, 2025. "Net IRR" and "Net TVPI" as printed in the fund-by-fund appendix of the Private Equity Portfolio Performance Report that LACERS posts semiannually (prepared on its private equity consultant's template; the cover gives www.aksia.com). The report defines TVPI as (cumulative distributions + fair market value) / cumulative contributions and labels IRRs of investments held less than two years "n.m."; 27 funds have no IRR (n.m., or "-" in the report) and 14 have no multiple ("-", mostly commitments with nothing contributed yet), all shown as blank. Dollar amounts are whole US dollars as reported (inception-to-date contributions and distributions). Total value = distributions + fair market value, and DPI = distributions / contributions, are computed. All 408 partnerships in the report are included: 305 active and 103 liquidated (no remaining fair market value), of which 23 are in LACERS' Specialized Portfolio and the rest in its Core Portfolio. LACERS counts 36 Credit/Distressed and 15 Natural Resources (energy) partnerships as private equity in this report, alongside buyout, growth equity, venture capital, secondaries, co-investment and fund-of-funds vehicles; its separate private credit and real estate reports are not imported. View source
Alaska Permanent Fund Corporation (APFC): APFC Private Equity Report: Private Equity Fund Commitments & Direct Investments / Co-Investments, as of December 31, 2025. APFC's quarterly Private Equity report ("Private Equity Fund Commitments & Direct Investments / Co-Investments") lists each fund with only its currency, "Vintage Year" and "Commitment (USD)", shown here in whole US dollars as printed. It reports no contributions, distributions, market value, multiple or IRR per fund, so paid-in, distributed, total value, IRR, TVPI and DPI are blank; nothing is derived or estimated. All 454 entries of the report's "Fund Investments" list are included ($17,570,561,197 committed); 15 have the vintage year "TBD" (blank here) and 45 are commitments in another currency that APFC states in US dollars. The report's separate "Direct Investments / Co-Investments" list (56 entries, $2,792,151,600: portfolio companies, co-investment vehicles and manager stakes) is not imported. The two lists add up to the report's printed Total Commitments of $20,362,712,795. For the whole portfolio, including liquidated investments, the report prints Cumulative Contributions of $20,951,089,446, Cumulative Distributions of $22,493,801,627 and a Remaining Fair Market Value of $15,555,575,745. APFC is a state-owned corporation that manages the Alaska Permanent Fund, not a pension plan; its separate Private Income report is not imported. View source
CalSTRS: CalSTRS Private Equity Portfolio Performance, as of June 30, 2025. Since-inception IRR as calculated by CalSTRS from its own cash flows with each partnership; CalSTRS does not label it net or gross; because it is computed from CalSTRS's own contributions and distributions, it is after the partnership's fees and carried interest. CalSTRS says IRRs in a partnership's first three years are not meaningful. CalSTRS reports no multiple: TVPI = (distributed + market value) / contributed and DPI = distributed / contributed are computed. IRR is blank for commitments with no capital contributed. View source
Nebraska Investment Council: Nebraska Investment Council Alternative Investment Performance Supplement, as of December 31, 2024. "IRR", "TVPI" and "DPI" since inception as printed in the partnership tables of the year-end Alternative Investment Performance Supplement prepared for the Council by Aon Investments USA Inc. and posted on the Council's website. The column is headed "IRR"; the supplement does not say whether it is net or gross of fees or how it is calculated. Its notes define Total Value = Cumulative Distributions + Net Asset Value, DPI = Cumulative Distributions / Cumulative Paid-In and TVPI = Total Value / Cumulative Paid-In; total value, TVPI and DPI are the printed figures, not computed here. Amounts are whole US dollars as printed (Total Commitments, Cumulative Paid-In, Cumulative Distributions); the supplement says the euro commitments to several European funds are shown in dollars at fixed exchange rates. Commitments with nothing paid in yet (1) are printed "N/A" and have no IRR or multiple. Vintage years are the supplement's. All 81 partnerships of its three private equity portfolios are included: 64 in the Defined Benefit Portfolio (the Defined Benefit and Cash Balance Benefit plans; names without a suffix), 9 in the Endowment Portfolio and 8 in the Omaha School Employees' Retirement System (OSERS) portfolio, whose assets the Council also invests; a fund held in more than one portfolio appears once for each, with that portfolio's own amounts. The Council classes 10 funds of funds and 13 mezzanine, distressed debt and energy partnerships as private equity here, alongside buyout, venture, secondaries, co-investment and special situations funds; its real estate and real assets tables are not imported. The supplement's footnotes say a fund that is winding down is carried at an estimated value based on an old statement. As of October 2026 this is the newest fund-level report the Council has posted: for later periods it posts a Private Equity Performance Report with vintage-year and manager totals only. View source
Figures are as each LP reports them for its own investment, so they can differ between LPs because of timing, fees, and share class. Not investment advice.