Hottub VC
Join free

New Enterprise Associates 15

New Enterprise Associates Vintage 2015 Reported by Employees' Retirement System of the State of Hawaii (HIERS), Los Angeles City Employees' Retirement System (LACERS), Alaska Permanent Fund Corporation (APFC), CalSTRS, Alameda County Employees' Retirement Association (ACERA)

Net IRRN/MEmployees' Retirement System of the State of Hawaii (HIERS), as of March 31, 2026
TVPI—Total value / paid-in
DPI—Distributions / paid-in
Versus vintage—Not ranked

What each LP reports

LPAs ofCommittedPaid inDistributedRemaining valueNet IRRTVPIDPIPaid in vs. value
Employees' Retirement System of the State of Hawaii (HIERS)2026-03-31$15M$14M——N/M——
Los Angeles City Employees' Retirement System (LACERS)2025-12-31$20M$19M$21M$14M10.4%1.83x1.09x
Alaska Permanent Fund Corporation (APFC)2025-12-31$25M———N/M——
CalSTRS2025-06-30$195M$187M$197M$130M10.0%1.75x1.05x
Alameda County Employees' Retirement Association (ACERA)2024-12-31$5M$4.7M$4.9M$3.5M10.4%1.77x—

Paid in Distributed Remaining value

2015 vintage in Employees' Retirement System of the State of Hawaii (HIERS)’s portfolio

All 11 funds of vintage 2015 in Employees' Retirement System of the State of Hawaii (HIERS)’s report, ranked by net IRR. Private equity, venture, and other strategies are mixed, so treat this as context rather than a strategy benchmark.

#FundNet IRRTVPIDPI
—Blackstone Energy Partners II, L.P.N/M——
—Blackstone Tactical Opportunities Fund II, L.P.N/M——
—EnCap Energy Capital Fund X, L.P.N/M——
—JMI Equity Fund VIII, L.P.N/M——
—Kelso Investment Associates IX, L.P.N/M——
—Neoma Global Growth Markets Strategic FundN/M——
—New Enterprise Associates 15, L.P.N/M——
—TPG Growth III, L.P.N/M——
—TPG Partners VII, L.P.N/M——
—Veritas Capital Fund V, L.P.N/M——
—Startup Capital Ventures Fund II, L.P.N/M——

2015 vintage in Los Angeles City Employees' Retirement System (LACERS)’s portfolio

All 17 funds of vintage 2015 in Los Angeles City Employees' Retirement System (LACERS)’s report, ranked by net IRR. Private equity, venture, and other strategies are mixed, so treat this as context rather than a strategy benchmark.

Sunstone Partners I: 32.6%Wynnchurch Capital Partners IV: 24.3%Insight Venture Partners IX: 22.9%Institutional Venture Partners XV: 22.8%Searchlight Capital II: 19.6%CenterGate Capital Partners I: 17.0%1315 Capital Fund: 16.4%Encap Energy Capital Fund X: 15.8%Thoma Bravo Special Opportunities Fund II: 15.6%Stripes III: 15.4%BDCM Opportunity Fund IV: 14.5%Angeles Equity Partners I: 13.4%The Baring Asia Private Equity Fund VI, L.P. 1: 12.7%Astorg VI: 12.5%New Enterprise Associates 15: 10.4%New Water Capital: 10.3%Oaktree Opportunities Fund X: 8.3%8.3%32.6%
#FundNet IRRTVPIDPI
1Sunstone Partners I32.6%3.09x2.50x
2Wynnchurch Capital Partners IV24.3%2.90x1.86x
3Insight Venture Partners IX22.9%4.04x2.74x
4Institutional Venture Partners XV22.8%2.87x2.00x
5Searchlight Capital II19.6%1.90x1.36x
6CenterGate Capital Partners I17.0%1.77x1.03x
71315 Capital Fund16.4%2.22x1.00x
8Encap Energy Capital Fund X15.8%2.15x1.71x
9Thoma Bravo Special Opportunities Fund II15.6%2.67x1.88x
10Stripes III15.4%2.34x1.48x
11BDCM Opportunity Fund IV14.5%1.99x1.05x
12Angeles Equity Partners I13.4%1.47x0.89x
13The Baring Asia Private Equity Fund VI, L.P. 112.7%1.73x1.60x
14Astorg VI12.5%1.72x1.32x
15New Enterprise Associates 1510.4%1.83x1.09x
16New Water Capital10.3%1.40x1.27x
17Oaktree Opportunities Fund X8.3%1.57x1.13x

2015 vintage in Alaska Permanent Fund Corporation (APFC)’s portfolio

All 26 funds of vintage 2015 in Alaska Permanent Fund Corporation (APFC)’s report, ranked by net IRR. Private equity, venture, and other strategies are mixed, so treat this as context rather than a strategy benchmark.

#FundNet IRRTVPIDPI
—Altitude Life Science Ventures Fund II LPN/M——
—Altitude Life Science Ventures Side Fund II LPN/M——
—American Industrial Partners Capital Fund VI LPN/M——
—Arch Venture Fund VIII Overage LPN/M——
—Blue Owl GP Stakes III US Investors LPN/M——
—Canaan X LPN/M——
—Catalyst Investors QP IV LPN/M——
—Centerbridge Capital Partners III LPN/M——
—Crestline AK Advisory Investments LPN/M——
—Clearlake Capital Partners IV LPN/M——
—Clearlake Opportunities Partners (E) LPN/M——
—EnCap Energy Capital Fund X LPN/M——
—Fortissimo Capital Fund IV LPN/M——
—Genstar Capital Partners VII LPN/M——
—Harvest Partners VII LPN/M——
—Hellman & Friedman Capital Partners VIII LPN/M——
—HV Holtzbrinck Ventures Fund VI SCSN/M——
—Index Ventures Growth III (Jersey) LPN/M——
—Institutional Venture Partners XV LPN/M——
—JMI Equity Fund VIII-A LPN/M——
—Kelso Investment Associates IX LPN/M——
—New Enterprise Associates 15 LPN/M——
—Quantum Parallel Partners VI-C LPN/M——
—Ridgemont Equity Partners II LPN/M——
—TA XII-A LPN/M——
—Wynnchurch Capital Partners IV LPN/M——

2015 vintage in CalSTRS’s portfolio

All 25 funds of vintage 2015 in CalSTRS’s report, ranked by net IRR. Private equity, venture, and other strategies are mixed, so treat this as context rather than a strategy benchmark.

JMI Equity Fund VIII, L.P.: 26.7%Francisco Partners IV, L.P.: 25.9%NEA 15 Opportunity Fund, L.P.: 25.2%Welsh, Carson, Anderson & Stowe XII, L.P.: 24.1%Strategic Investors VII-A: 20.4%ECI 10 A LP: 19.4%EnCap Energy Capital Fund X, L.P.: 16.2%Thoma Bravo Special Opportunities Fund II, L.P.: 15.9%Vivo Capital Surplus Fund VIII, L.P.: 15.9%Carlyle U.S. Equity Opportunity Fund II, L.P.: 15.3%Vivo Capital Fund VIII, L.P.: 14.9%Centerbridge Capital Partners III, L.P.: 14.1%Cortec Group Fund VI, L.P.: 13.7%Madison Dearborn Capital VII-A/B: 13.3%ASF VII B L.P.: 13.1%Carlyle Europe Partners IV, L.P.: 11.4%New Enterprise Associates 15, LP: 10.0%Blackstone Energy Partners II L.P.: 8.1%CVI Credit Value Fund A III: 7.9%RRJ Capital Master Fund III, L.P.: 7.3%FCO MA IV L.P. PE: 7.0%Castlelake IV, L.P.: 6.7%Equistone Partners Europe Fund V "D" L.P: 6.6%GGV Capital Select, L.P: 2.9%BRV Opportunities Fund, L.P.: -1.9%-1.9%26.7%
#FundNet IRRTVPIDPI
1JMI Equity Fund VIII, L.P.26.7%2.45x1.95x
2Francisco Partners IV, L.P.25.9%3.06x2.38x
3NEA 15 Opportunity Fund, L.P.25.2%3.68x1.44x
4Welsh, Carson, Anderson & Stowe XII, L.P.24.1%2.45x1.99x
5Strategic Investors VII-A20.4%3.55x1.46x
6ECI 10 A LP19.4%2.27x2.20x
7EnCap Energy Capital Fund X, L.P.16.2%2.16x1.68x
8Thoma Bravo Special Opportunities Fund II, L.P.15.9%2.51x1.78x
9Vivo Capital Surplus Fund VIII, L.P.15.9%2.01x1.55x
10Carlyle U.S. Equity Opportunity Fund II, L.P.15.3%1.89x1.41x
11Vivo Capital Fund VIII, L.P.14.9%1.96x1.51x
12Centerbridge Capital Partners III, L.P.14.1%1.58x1.11x
13Cortec Group Fund VI, L.P.13.7%1.99x1.31x
14Madison Dearborn Capital VII-A/B13.3%1.86x1.04x
15ASF VII B L.P.13.1%1.54x1.07x
16Carlyle Europe Partners IV, L.P.11.4%1.58x1.30x
17New Enterprise Associates 15, LP10.0%1.75x1.05x
18Blackstone Energy Partners II L.P.8.1%1.50x0.85x
19CVI Credit Value Fund A III7.9%1.35x1.30x
20RRJ Capital Master Fund III, L.P.7.3%1.20x0.91x
21FCO MA IV L.P. PE7.0%1.30x0.99x
22Castlelake IV, L.P.6.7%1.51x1.02x
23Equistone Partners Europe Fund V "D" L.P6.6%1.40x1.13x
24GGV Capital Select, L.P2.9%1.20x0.95x
25BRV Opportunities Fund, L.P.-1.9%0.89x0.47x

2015 vintage in Alameda County Employees' Retirement Association (ACERA)’s portfolio

All 5 funds of vintage 2015 in Alameda County Employees' Retirement Association (ACERA)’s report, ranked by net IRR. Private equity, venture, and other strategies are mixed, so treat this as context rather than a strategy benchmark.

JLL Partners Fund VII, L.P.: 16.0%Warburg Pincus Private Equity XII, L.P.: 15.8%LHP Strategic Alpha Fund, LLC: 12.0%New Enterprise Associates 15, L.P.: 10.4%Catalyst Fund V, L.P.: 3.5%3.5%16.0%
#FundNet IRRTVPIDPI
1JLL Partners Fund VII, L.P.16.0%2.34x—
2Warburg Pincus Private Equity XII, L.P.15.8%2.04x—
3LHP Strategic Alpha Fund, LLC12.0%1.41x—
4New Enterprise Associates 15, L.P.10.4%1.77x—
5Catalyst Fund V, L.P.3.5%1.20x—

Other reported funds by this firm

About this data

Employees' Retirement System of the State of Hawaii (HIERS): HIERS Private Equity Partnerships: Performance Summary by Investment, as of March 31, 2026. ERS posts a quarterly "Performance Summary by Investment" of its private equity partnerships in which only "Capital Committed", "Paid-In Capital" and "Reported Market Value" (with the date of that value) are filled in; the Capital Distributed, Remaining Cost, Net IRR and TVM columns are empty in the published version. So committed, paid-in and market value are shown, in whole US dollars as printed, and distributed, total value, IRR, TVPI and DPI are blank; nothing is derived or estimated. The report says paid-in capital includes both commitment and non-commitment reducing capital calls, that cash flows are HIERS' actual cash paid and received, and that market values reflect HIERS' unrealized interest in each investment. "Vintage Year" is as printed. All 371 investments are included as ERS classifies them by strategy (61 Buyout - Large, 42 Buyout - Mega, 59 Buyout - Mid, 13 Buyout - Small, 3 Co/Direct Investment, 6 Distressed Debt, 40 Growth Equity, 10 Mezzanine, 2 Secondaries, 10 Special Situations, 125 Venture Capital), in the report's blocks: Core (334), Stafford Capital Management - 1 (8), Stafford Capital Management - 2 (11), Stafford Capital Management - 3 (17), Stafford Ho'oulu Fund (1); the Stafford Capital Management blocks list the partnerships held through the Hawaii Targeted Investment Program funds (HiTIP I, II and III) that ERS's Holdings page also reports separately. They add up to the printed Grand Total of $8,371,769,464 committed, $6,707,086,129 paid in and $5,197,639,074 reported market value. 114 investments have no remaining value (liquidated, or not yet called), shown as 0; 9 others carry a value dated before the report date. Each page of the report carries the legend "Institutional Use Only/Not for Public Use | Proprietary and Confidential"; this is the version ERS itself posts on its Holdings page. ERS's separate private credit, real assets and timber reports are not imported. View source

Los Angeles City Employees' Retirement System (LACERS): LACERS Private Equity Portfolio Performance Report, as of December 31, 2025. "Net IRR" and "Net TVPI" as printed in the fund-by-fund appendix of the Private Equity Portfolio Performance Report that LACERS posts semiannually (prepared on its private equity consultant's template; the cover gives www.aksia.com). The report defines TVPI as (cumulative distributions + fair market value) / cumulative contributions and labels IRRs of investments held less than two years "n.m."; 27 funds have no IRR (n.m., or "-" in the report) and 14 have no multiple ("-", mostly commitments with nothing contributed yet), all shown as blank. Dollar amounts are whole US dollars as reported (inception-to-date contributions and distributions). Total value = distributions + fair market value, and DPI = distributions / contributions, are computed. All 408 partnerships in the report are included: 305 active and 103 liquidated (no remaining fair market value), of which 23 are in LACERS' Specialized Portfolio and the rest in its Core Portfolio. LACERS counts 36 Credit/Distressed and 15 Natural Resources (energy) partnerships as private equity in this report, alongside buyout, growth equity, venture capital, secondaries, co-investment and fund-of-funds vehicles; its separate private credit and real estate reports are not imported. View source

Alaska Permanent Fund Corporation (APFC): APFC Private Equity Report: Private Equity Fund Commitments & Direct Investments / Co-Investments, as of December 31, 2025. APFC's quarterly Private Equity report ("Private Equity Fund Commitments & Direct Investments / Co-Investments") lists each fund with only its currency, "Vintage Year" and "Commitment (USD)", shown here in whole US dollars as printed. It reports no contributions, distributions, market value, multiple or IRR per fund, so paid-in, distributed, total value, IRR, TVPI and DPI are blank; nothing is derived or estimated. All 454 entries of the report's "Fund Investments" list are included ($17,570,561,197 committed); 15 have the vintage year "TBD" (blank here) and 45 are commitments in another currency that APFC states in US dollars. The report's separate "Direct Investments / Co-Investments" list (56 entries, $2,792,151,600: portfolio companies, co-investment vehicles and manager stakes) is not imported. The two lists add up to the report's printed Total Commitments of $20,362,712,795. For the whole portfolio, including liquidated investments, the report prints Cumulative Contributions of $20,951,089,446, Cumulative Distributions of $22,493,801,627 and a Remaining Fair Market Value of $15,555,575,745. APFC is a state-owned corporation that manages the Alaska Permanent Fund, not a pension plan; its separate Private Income report is not imported. View source

CalSTRS: CalSTRS Private Equity Portfolio Performance, as of June 30, 2025. Since-inception IRR as calculated by CalSTRS from its own cash flows with each partnership; CalSTRS does not label it net or gross; because it is computed from CalSTRS's own contributions and distributions, it is after the partnership's fees and carried interest. CalSTRS says IRRs in a partnership's first three years are not meaningful. CalSTRS reports no multiple: TVPI = (distributed + market value) / contributed and DPI = distributed / contributed are computed. IRR is blank for commitments with no capital contributed. View source

Alameda County Employees' Retirement Association (ACERA): ACERA Annual Report on Alternative Investments (Government Code Section 7514.7 Disclosures Chart), as of December 31, 2024. From the Alternative Investment Vehicle (AIV) Disclosures Chart that ACERA staff present to the Investment Committee each December under California Government Code Section 7514.7, for the period ending 2024-12-31 (ACERA's fiscal year is the calendar year). The chart says it is prepared by ACERA from its own records and the fund managers' reports and has not been prepared, reviewed or approved by the fund managers. Net IRR is the chart's "Net IRR (Since Inception)" and TVPI its "Investment Multiple (Since Inception)", both as printed; for 36 funds the printed multiple differs from (Cash Distributions + NAV) / Cash Contributions, and DPI is left blank. Amounts are whole US dollars as printed: Commitment, "Cash Contributions (Since Inception)", and "Cash Distributions", which the chart heads "(FY 2024)" on a fiscal-year-end basis and which are cumulative to that date; total value is the printed "Cash Distributions + NAV". Vintage is the chart's "Vintage Year". 3 recent commitments with no NAV yet ("N/A") have only a commitment; 7 funds have no Net IRR ("N/A"), and for 4 more the chart gives a time-weighted return instead of an IRR, which is left blank. The chart lists all 115 alternative investment vehicles together and does not separate asset classes, so besides private equity and venture funds it includes private credit, real estate, infrastructure and other real assets funds; all are included as listed. 46 funds contracted before 2017 are not required to report under Section 7514.7 and are shown where the manager shared the information voluntarily. View source

Figures are as each LP reports them for its own investment, so they can differ between LPs because of timing, fees, and share class. Not investment advice.