New Enterprise Associates 12
New Enterprise Associates Vintage 2006 Reported by Employees' Retirement System of the State of Hawaii (HIERS), Washington State Investment Board, Pennsylvania SERS, CalSTRS
What each LP reports
| LP | As of | Committed | Paid in | Distributed | Remaining value | Net IRR | TVPI | DPI | Paid in vs. value |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Employees' Retirement System of the State of Hawaii (HIERS) | 2026-03-31 | $10M | $9.8M | — | — | N/M | — | — | |
| Washington State Investment Board | 2026-03-31 | $50M | $49M | $68M | $1M | 6.3% | 1.41x | 1.39x | |
| Pennsylvania SERS | 2025-12-31 | $35M | $36M | $49M | $0.9M | 6.4% | 1.40x | 1.38x | |
| CalSTRS | 2025-06-30 | $160M | $158M | $218M | $3.9M | 6.2% | 1.41x | 1.38x |
Paid in Distributed Remaining value
2006 vintage in Employees' Retirement System of the State of Hawaii (HIERS)’s portfolio
All 17 funds of vintage 2006 in Employees' Retirement System of the State of Hawaii (HIERS)’s report, ranked by net IRR. Private equity, venture, and other strategies are mixed, so treat this as context rather than a strategy benchmark.
| # | Fund | Net IRR | TVPI | DPI |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| — | Alta Partners VIII, L.P. | N/M | — | — |
| — | Atlas Venture Fund VII, L.P. | N/M | — | — |
| — | Austin Ventures IX, L.P. | N/M | — | — |
| — | EQT V, L.P. | N/M | — | — |
| — | First Reserve Fund XI, L.P. | N/M | — | — |
| — | GTCR Fund IX, L.P. | N/M | — | — |
| — | KKR 2006 Fund, L.P. | N/M | — | — |
| — | M/C Venture Partners VI, L.P. | N/M | — | — |
| — | Madison Dearborn Capital Partners V, L.P. | N/M | — | — |
| — | New Enterprise Associates 12, L.P. | N/M | — | — |
| — | Oak Investment Partners XII, L.P. | N/M | — | — |
| — | Spectrum Equity Investors V, L.P. | N/M | — | — |
| — | Summit Partners Private Equity Fund VII-A, L.P. | N/M | — | — |
| — | TA Subordinated Debt Fund II, L.P. | N/M | — | — |
| — | TA X, L.P. | N/M | — | — |
| — | Thomas H. Lee Equity Fund VI, L.P. | N/M | — | — |
| — | Thomas, McNerney & Partners II, L.P. | N/M | — | — |
2006 vintage in Washington State Investment Board’s portfolio
All 20 funds of vintage 2006 in Washington State Investment Board’s report, ranked by net IRR. Private equity, venture, and other strategies are mixed, so treat this as context rather than a strategy benchmark.
| # | Fund | Net IRR | TVPI | DPI |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | KSL Capital Partners II, L.P. | 15.3% | 1.94x | 1.94x |
| 2 | GTCR Fund IX, L.P. | 13.8% | 1.81x | 1.81x |
| 3 | Menlo Ventures X, L.P. | 10.4% | 2.06x | 2.04x |
| 4 | KKR 2006 Fund, L.P. | 9.4% | 1.75x | 1.75x |
| 5 | OCM Principal Opportunities Fund IV, LP | 8.8% | 1.67x | 1.67x |
| 6 | Blackstone Capital Partners V, L.P. | 8.8% | 1.68x | 1.68x |
| 7 | Permira IV, L.P. | 8.6% | 1.56x | 1.56x |
| 8 | Avenue Special Situations Fund IV, L.P. | 8.4% | 1.31x | 1.31x |
| 9 | OVP Venture Partners VII, L.P. | 8.3% | 3.27x | 0.91x |
| 10 | Madison Dearborn Capital Partners V, L.P. | 7.5% | 1.55x | 1.55x |
| 11 | Nordic Capital Fund VI, L.P. | 6.9% | 1.51x | 1.51x |
| 12 | Fisher Lynch Co-Investment Partnership, L.P. | 6.8% | 1.47x | 1.47x |
| 13 | New Enterprise Associates 12, L.P. | 6.3% | 1.41x | 1.39x |
| 14 | HIPEP V-Asia Pacific and Rest of World Fund, L.P. | 5.6% | 1.39x | 1.39x |
| 15 | TPG Partners V, L.P. | 4.8% | 1.35x | 1.35x |
| 16 | Avenue Asia Special Situations Fund IV, L.P. | 1.2% | 1.06x | 1.06x |
| 17 | Charterhouse Capital Partners VIII, L.P. | -0.6% | 0.96x | 0.96x |
| 18 | Fortress Investment Fund IV, L.P. | -2.4% | 0.83x | 0.83x |
| 19 | Fortress Investment Fund IV, L.P. - Co-Investment | -4.4% | 0.72x | 0.72x |
| 20 | First Reserve Fund XI, L.P. | -9.4% | 0.69x | 0.69x |
2006 vintage in Pennsylvania SERS’s portfolio
All 6 funds of vintage 2006 in Pennsylvania SERS’s report, ranked by net IRR. Private equity, venture, and other strategies are mixed, so treat this as context rather than a strategy benchmark.
| # | Fund | Net IRR | TVPI | DPI |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Berkshire Fund VII | 17.3% | 2.13x | 2.10x |
| 2 | HarbourVest Partners VIII | 11.8% | 2.48x | 2.01x |
| 3 | Asia Alternatives Capital Partners | 10.7% | 1.79x | 1.79x |
| 4 | Blackstone Capital Partners V | 7.6% | 1.67x | 1.67x |
| 5 | New Enterprise Associates 12 | 6.4% | 1.40x | 1.38x |
| 6 | Eureka II | 4.2% | 1.27x | 1.12x |
2006 vintage in CalSTRS’s portfolio
All 14 funds of vintage 2006 in CalSTRS’s report, ranked by net IRR. Private equity, venture, and other strategies are mixed, so treat this as context rather than a strategy benchmark.
| # | Fund | Net IRR | TVPI | DPI |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Centerbridge Capital Partners, LP | 19.1% | 2.31x | 2.31x |
| 2 | Triton Fund II L.P. | 18.6% | 2.29x | 2.29x |
| 3 | Onex Partners II, L.P. | 12.7% | 1.82x | 1.81x |
| 4 | Pond Ventures III, L.P. | 12.4% | 1.88x | 1.88x |
| 5 | Summit Partners Private Equity Fund VII-A, L.P. | 10.2% | 1.87x | 1.83x |
| 6 | Permira IV | 9.0% | 1.77x | 1.55x |
| 7 | Apollo Investment Fund VI, L.P. | 8.6% | 1.68x | 1.67x |
| 8 | Blackstone Capital Partners V L.P. | 8.4% | 1.71x | 1.71x |
| 9 | New Enterprise Associates 12 | 6.2% | 1.41x | 1.38x |
| 10 | TPG Partners V, L.P. | 4.8% | 1.44x | 1.44x |
| 11 | Charterhouse Capital VIII, L.P. | -0.6% | 0.96x | 0.96x |
| 12 | Asper Renewable Power Partners L.P. | -4.1% | 0.84x | 0.83x |
| 13 | VantagePoint Venture Partners 2006 (Q) | -7.8% | 0.40x | 0.25x |
| 14 | First Reserve Fund XI, L.P. | -8.9% | 0.64x | 0.64x |
Other reported funds by this firm
About this data
Employees' Retirement System of the State of Hawaii (HIERS): HIERS Private Equity Partnerships: Performance Summary by Investment, as of March 31, 2026. ERS posts a quarterly "Performance Summary by Investment" of its private equity partnerships in which only "Capital Committed", "Paid-In Capital" and "Reported Market Value" (with the date of that value) are filled in; the Capital Distributed, Remaining Cost, Net IRR and TVM columns are empty in the published version. So committed, paid-in and market value are shown, in whole US dollars as printed, and distributed, total value, IRR, TVPI and DPI are blank; nothing is derived or estimated. The report says paid-in capital includes both commitment and non-commitment reducing capital calls, that cash flows are HIERS' actual cash paid and received, and that market values reflect HIERS' unrealized interest in each investment. "Vintage Year" is as printed. All 371 investments are included as ERS classifies them by strategy (61 Buyout - Large, 42 Buyout - Mega, 59 Buyout - Mid, 13 Buyout - Small, 3 Co/Direct Investment, 6 Distressed Debt, 40 Growth Equity, 10 Mezzanine, 2 Secondaries, 10 Special Situations, 125 Venture Capital), in the report's blocks: Core (334), Stafford Capital Management - 1 (8), Stafford Capital Management - 2 (11), Stafford Capital Management - 3 (17), Stafford Ho'oulu Fund (1); the Stafford Capital Management blocks list the partnerships held through the Hawaii Targeted Investment Program funds (HiTIP I, II and III) that ERS's Holdings page also reports separately. They add up to the printed Grand Total of $8,371,769,464 committed, $6,707,086,129 paid in and $5,197,639,074 reported market value. 114 investments have no remaining value (liquidated, or not yet called), shown as 0; 9 others carry a value dated before the report date. Each page of the report carries the legend "Institutional Use Only/Not for Public Use | Proprietary and Confidential"; this is the version ERS itself posts on its Holdings page. ERS's separate private credit, real assets and timber reports are not imported. View source
Washington State Investment Board: WSIB Private Equity Portfolio Performance Summary By Strategy, as of March 31, 2026. Net IRR as labeled by WSIB, calculated by Hamilton Lane from general partner cash flows and valuations and not confirmed by the general partners. TVPI is WSIB's total value multiple (B+C)/A recomputed to two decimals from the reported totals (WSIB prints one decimal). WSIB lists an initial investment date rather than a vintage year; its year is used as the vintage (blank for commitments not yet funded). Includes realized and legacy partnerships. View source
Pennsylvania SERS: SERS Quarterly Private Equity Board Update, Schedule of Investments by Sector, as of December 31, 2025. IRR and TVM (total value multiple) as reported by SERS in a quarterly update prepared by StepStone Group. The schedule's column is headed "IRR"; the report says "Net IRR is net of managers' fees, expenses, and carried interest" and that, unless otherwise indicated, performance is net of fees and expenses charged by the underlying investment but gross of StepStone vehicle/account fees and expenses. It also says the figures were prepared by StepStone on behalf of SERS and not provided by any general partner, and that IRR and TVM for certain vehicles may have been impacted by subscription-backed credit facilities. Total value = market value + distributions; TVPI is SERS's TVM recomputed to two decimals from the reported amounts (SERS prints one decimal) and DPI = distributions / contributions is computed. SERS marks some partnerships NM ("Not Meaningful", no rule stated) and leaves the TVM and IRR cells, and usually the market value, empty for 29 others; those fields are blank here. Covers the buyout, growth equity and special situations partnerships on the schedule; the Keystone Legacy Fund line (SERS's pooled non-core legacy funds) and the separate legacy private credit schedule are not included. Commitments to non-USD funds reflect current exchange rates. View source
CalSTRS: CalSTRS Private Equity Portfolio Performance, as of June 30, 2025. Since-inception IRR as calculated by CalSTRS from its own cash flows with each partnership; CalSTRS does not label it net or gross; because it is computed from CalSTRS's own contributions and distributions, it is after the partnership's fees and carried interest. CalSTRS says IRRs in a partnership's first three years are not meaningful. CalSTRS reports no multiple: TVPI = (distributed + market value) / contributed and DPI = distributed / contributed are computed. IRR is blank for commitments with no capital contributed. View source
Figures are as each LP reports them for its own investment, so they can differ between LPs because of timing, fees, and share class. Not investment advice.