Hottub VC
Join free

TCV IX

TCV Vintage 2016 Reported by Washington State Investment Board, Los Angeles City Employees' Retirement System (LACERS), Alaska Permanent Fund Corporation (APFC), North Carolina Retirement Systems (NCRS)

Net IRR18.0%Washington State Investment Board, as of March 31, 2026
TVPI2.11xTotal value / paid-in
DPI1.49xDistributions / paid-in
Versus vintageQ2Second quartile · #4 of 14

What each LP reports

LPAs ofCommittedPaid inDistributedRemaining valueNet IRRTVPIDPIPaid in vs. value
Washington State Investment Board2026-03-31$200M$180M$267M$112M18.0%2.11x1.49x
Los Angeles City Employees' Retirement System (LACERS)2025-12-31$10M$8M$12M$6.5M19.0%2.37x1.55x
Alaska Permanent Fund Corporation (APFC)2025-12-31$65M———N/M——
North Carolina Retirement Systems (NCRS)2025-12-31$150M—$198M$108M19.6%2.30x1.49x

Paid in Distributed Remaining value

2016 vintage in Washington State Investment Board’s portfolio

All 14 funds of vintage 2016 in Washington State Investment Board’s report, ranked by net IRR. Private equity, venture, and other strategies are mixed, so treat this as context rather than a strategy benchmark.

TA XII, L.P.: 33.6%Endeavour Capital Fund VII, L.P.: 18.7%Charterhouse Capital Partners X, L.P.: 18.2%TCV IX, L.P.: 18.0%Bridgepoint Europe V, L.P.: 15.5%Advent International GPE VIII-B, L.P.: 15.0%Menlo Inflection I, L.P.: 12.3%Blackstone Capital Partners VII, L.P.: 12.1%KSL Capital Partners IV, L.P.: 11.3%Hellman & Friedman Capital Partners VIII, L.P.: 9.2%PAG Asia II, L.P.: 8.8%Bridgepoint Europe IV, L.P. (Secondary Purchase): 8.2%Warburg Pincus China, L.P.: 5.2%Roark Capital Partners IV, L.P.: 4.5%4.5%33.6%
#FundNet IRRTVPIDPI
1TA XII, L.P.33.6%2.88x2.27x
2Endeavour Capital Fund VII, L.P.18.7%2.44x1.78x
3Charterhouse Capital Partners X, L.P.18.2%1.73x1.73x
4TCV IX, L.P.18.0%2.11x1.49x
5Bridgepoint Europe V, L.P.15.5%1.90x1.42x
6Advent International GPE VIII-B, L.P.15.0%2.07x1.54x
7Menlo Inflection I, L.P.12.3%2.48x0.21x
8Blackstone Capital Partners VII, L.P.12.1%1.71x1.04x
9KSL Capital Partners IV, L.P.11.3%1.58x0.82x
10Hellman & Friedman Capital Partners VIII, L.P.9.2%1.65x0.83x
11PAG Asia II, L.P.8.8%1.61x1.06x
12Bridgepoint Europe IV, L.P. (Secondary Purchase)8.2%1.29x1.17x
13Warburg Pincus China, L.P.5.2%1.33x0.49x
14Roark Capital Partners IV, L.P.4.5%1.29x1.29x

2016 vintage in Los Angeles City Employees' Retirement System (LACERS)’s portfolio

All 20 funds of vintage 2016 in Los Angeles City Employees' Retirement System (LACERS)’s report, ranked by net IRR. Private equity, venture, and other strategies are mixed, so treat this as context rather than a strategy benchmark.

TA XII-A: 34.1%Gilde Buy-Out Fund V: 25.8%ABRY Heritage Partners: 25.7%Bain Capital Double Impact Fund: 23.1%Bain Capital Asia Fund III: 21.8%EnCap Energy Capital Fund XI: 21.3%TCV IX: 19.0%Platinum Equity Capital Partners IV: 18.1%Vista Foundation Fund III: 18.0%Longitude Venture Partners III: 16.5%Advent International GPE VIII B-2: 15.4%Vista Equity Partners Fund VI: 15.4%Thoma Bravo Fund XII: 14.5%Polaris Partners VIII: 14.4%Threshold Ventures II: 14.4%ABRY Senior Equity V: 11.8%StepStone Secondary Opportunities III: 11.1%Hellman & Friedman Capital Partners VIII: 10.1%American Securities Partners VII: 8.4%Harvest Partners VII: 8.1%8.1%34.1%
#FundNet IRRTVPIDPI
1TA XII-A34.1%3.33x2.42x
2Gilde Buy-Out Fund V25.8%2.47x2.23x
3ABRY Heritage Partners25.7%2.06x1.51x
4Bain Capital Double Impact Fund23.1%1.96x1.55x
5Bain Capital Asia Fund III21.8%2.29x1.36x
6EnCap Energy Capital Fund XI21.3%1.99x1.32x
7TCV IX19.0%2.37x1.55x
8Platinum Equity Capital Partners IV18.1%1.90x1.23x
9Vista Foundation Fund III18.0%1.89x1.11x
10Longitude Venture Partners III16.5%1.72x1.05x
11Advent International GPE VIII B-215.4%2.09x1.49x
12Vista Equity Partners Fund VI15.4%1.99x1.29x
13Thoma Bravo Fund XII14.5%2.18x1.70x
14Polaris Partners VIII14.4%1.94x1.05x
15Threshold Ventures II14.4%2.57x0.31x
16ABRY Senior Equity V11.8%1.59x0.81x
17StepStone Secondary Opportunities III11.1%1.54x1.11x
18Hellman & Friedman Capital Partners VIII10.1%1.75x0.81x
19American Securities Partners VII8.4%1.53x1.01x
20Harvest Partners VII8.1%1.42x0.93x

2016 vintage in Alaska Permanent Fund Corporation (APFC)’s portfolio

All 34 funds of vintage 2016 in Alaska Permanent Fund Corporation (APFC)’s report, ranked by net IRR. Private equity, venture, and other strategies are mixed, so treat this as context rather than a strategy benchmark.

#FundNet IRRTVPIDPI
—Advantech Capital LPN/M——
—Advent International GPE VIII-B Limited PartnershipN/M——
—Arch Venture Fund IX LPN/M——
—Arch Venture Fund IX Overage LPN/M——
—Bain Capital Asia Fund III LPN/M——
—Battery Ventures XI-A LPN/M——
—Battery Ventures XI-A Side Fund LPN/M——
—Blackstone Capital Partners VII LPN/M——
—Centerbridge Special Credit Partners III LPN/M——
—Dawson Portfolio Finance 1 LPN/M——
—Green Equity Investors VII LPN/M——
—HV Holtzbrinck Ventures Co-Investment Fund I GmbH & Co KGN/M——
—Index Ventures VIII (Jersey) LPN/M——
—Industrial Growth Partners V LP and Industrial Growth Partners V AIV LPN/M——
—L Catterton VIII LPN/M——
—L Catterton Growth Partners III LPN/M——
—Lightspeed Venture Partners XI LPN/M——
—Lightspeed Venture Partners Select II LPN/M——
—Marlin Heritage Europe LPN/M——
—Mayfield XV A Cayman Islands Exempted Limited PartnershipN/M——
—Mayfield Select A Cayman Islands Exempted Limited PartnershipN/M——
—Nautic Partners VIII LPN/M——
—NorthEdge Capital Fund II LPN/M——
—ONCAP IV LPN/M——
—Permira VI LP1N/M——
—Redview Capital LPN/M——
—Southvest Fund VII LPN/M——
—Summit Partners Growth Equity Fund IX-A LPN/M——
—Summit Partners Venture Capital Fund IV-A LPN/M——
—TCV IX LPN/M——
—Thoma Bravo Fund XII LPN/M——
—Vista Equity Partners Fund VI LPN/M——
—Vista Foundation Fund III LPN/M——
—Warburg Pincus Private Equity XII LPN/M——

2016 vintage in North Carolina Retirement Systems (NCRS)’s portfolio

All 6 funds of vintage 2016 in North Carolina Retirement Systems (NCRS)’s report, ranked by net IRR. Private equity, venture, and other strategies are mixed, so treat this as context rather than a strategy benchmark.

L Catterton Growth Partners III, L.P.: 25.5%Arch IX Overage: 22.7%TCV IX, L.P.: 19.6%Arch Venture Fund IX: 19.1%Thoma Bravo XII: 15.2%Harvest Partners VII, L.P.: 15.2%15.2%25.5%
#FundNet IRRTVPIDPI
1L Catterton Growth Partners III, L.P.25.5%3.08x1.87x
2Arch IX Overage22.7%2.56x1.89x
3TCV IX, L.P.19.6%2.30x1.49x
4Arch Venture Fund IX19.1%2.16x1.53x
5Thoma Bravo XII15.2%2.20x1.71x
6Harvest Partners VII, L.P.15.2%2.01x0.93x

Other reported funds by this firm

FundVintageNet IRRTVPIVersus vintage
TCV XII2024N/M—
Technology Crossover Ventures XII2024N/M—
TCV XII202233.4%1.28xTop quartile
TCV XI20214.0%1.15xBottom quartile
Technology Crossover Ventures XI20214.0%1.15xBottom quartile
TCV XI2020N/M—
TCV X201922.0%2.89xTop quartile
Technology Crossover Ventures X201922.0%2.98xTop quartile
Technology Crossover Ventures IX201619.0%—Top quartile
TCV VIII2014N/M2.32x
Technology Crossover Ventures VIII201412.2%—Third quartile
TCV VIII2013N/M—
TCV VII2008N/M—
Technology Crossover Ventures VII200823.3%—Top quartile
TCV VII200722.7%2.93xTop quartile
TCV VI200612.4%1.58xTop quartile
Technology Crossover Ventures VI200612.3%—Top quartile
TCV VI200512.3%1.56xTop quartile
TCV V200410.6%1.85xThird quartile
Technology Crossover Ventures V200410.6%—Second quartile
Technology Crossover Ventures IV20008.9%—Second quartile
Technology Crossover Ventures II199775.9%—Top quartile
Technology Crossover Ventures I199534.6%—Second quartile
TCV IX—N/M—
TCV VII—N/M—
TCV VII, VIII, IX, X, XI, XII—N/M—
TCV VIII—N/M—
TCV Velocity Fund I—N/M—
TCV X—N/M—
TCV XI—N/M—
TCV XII—N/M—
Technology Crossover Ventures IX—18.0%2.14x
Technology Crossover Ventures IX: TCV Sports—9.0%1.88x
Technology Crossover Ventures VIII—11.8%2.27x
Technology Crossover Ventures X—22.0%2.76x
Technology Crossover Ventures XI—4.0%1.15x

About this data

Washington State Investment Board: WSIB Private Equity Portfolio Performance Summary By Strategy, as of March 31, 2026. Net IRR as labeled by WSIB, calculated by Hamilton Lane from general partner cash flows and valuations and not confirmed by the general partners. TVPI is WSIB's total value multiple (B+C)/A recomputed to two decimals from the reported totals (WSIB prints one decimal). WSIB lists an initial investment date rather than a vintage year; its year is used as the vintage (blank for commitments not yet funded). Includes realized and legacy partnerships. View source

Los Angeles City Employees' Retirement System (LACERS): LACERS Private Equity Portfolio Performance Report, as of December 31, 2025. "Net IRR" and "Net TVPI" as printed in the fund-by-fund appendix of the Private Equity Portfolio Performance Report that LACERS posts semiannually (prepared on its private equity consultant's template; the cover gives www.aksia.com). The report defines TVPI as (cumulative distributions + fair market value) / cumulative contributions and labels IRRs of investments held less than two years "n.m."; 27 funds have no IRR (n.m., or "-" in the report) and 14 have no multiple ("-", mostly commitments with nothing contributed yet), all shown as blank. Dollar amounts are whole US dollars as reported (inception-to-date contributions and distributions). Total value = distributions + fair market value, and DPI = distributions / contributions, are computed. All 408 partnerships in the report are included: 305 active and 103 liquidated (no remaining fair market value), of which 23 are in LACERS' Specialized Portfolio and the rest in its Core Portfolio. LACERS counts 36 Credit/Distressed and 15 Natural Resources (energy) partnerships as private equity in this report, alongside buyout, growth equity, venture capital, secondaries, co-investment and fund-of-funds vehicles; its separate private credit and real estate reports are not imported. View source

Alaska Permanent Fund Corporation (APFC): APFC Private Equity Report: Private Equity Fund Commitments & Direct Investments / Co-Investments, as of December 31, 2025. APFC's quarterly Private Equity report ("Private Equity Fund Commitments & Direct Investments / Co-Investments") lists each fund with only its currency, "Vintage Year" and "Commitment (USD)", shown here in whole US dollars as printed. It reports no contributions, distributions, market value, multiple or IRR per fund, so paid-in, distributed, total value, IRR, TVPI and DPI are blank; nothing is derived or estimated. All 454 entries of the report's "Fund Investments" list are included ($17,570,561,197 committed); 15 have the vintage year "TBD" (blank here) and 45 are commitments in another currency that APFC states in US dollars. The report's separate "Direct Investments / Co-Investments" list (56 entries, $2,792,151,600: portfolio companies, co-investment vehicles and manager stakes) is not imported. The two lists add up to the report's printed Total Commitments of $20,362,712,795. For the whole portfolio, including liquidated investments, the report prints Cumulative Contributions of $20,951,089,446, Cumulative Distributions of $22,493,801,627 and a Remaining Fair Market Value of $15,555,575,745. APFC is a state-owned corporation that manages the Alaska Permanent Fund, not a pension plan; its separate Private Income report is not imported. View source

North Carolina Retirement Systems (NCRS): NCRS Market Value and Performance Report: NCRS Private Equity Portfolio, as of December 31, 2025. "IRR", "TVPI" and "DPI" as printed in the "NCRS Private Equity Portfolio" table of the calendar-year NCRS Market Value and Performance Report posted by the North Carolina Department of State Treasurer. The report's notes say returns are calculated using the internal rate of return methodology and "are reported net of fees", that TVPI is the ratio of cumulative distributions plus the valuation to cumulative paid-in, and that DPI is the ratio of cumulative distributions to cumulative paid-in. Dollar values are reported in thousands and shown here multiplied by 1,000. The table gives each fund's vintage, market value, commitment, unfunded commitment and distributions, but not contributions, so paid-in capital is blank; total value = distributions + market value is computed. A dash or "N/A" in the IRR or TVPI column is shown as blank (11 funds have no IRR, mostly commitments with little or nothing paid in). All 174 funds in the table are included (buyout, growth, venture, secondaries, co-investment and fund-of-funds vehicles as the Treasurer classifies them), of which 74 carry a liquidation year and no market value; the table's "Stock Distribution" and cash lines ($515,000 of market value) are not funds and are left out. The funds add up to the report's "Total Private Equity Portfolio" row: $6,802,884,000 market value, $16,595,939,000 commitments, $3,799,415,000 unfunded and $15,429,993,000 distributions. The Non-Core Real Estate, Opportunistic Fixed Income, Inflation Sensitive, Core Real Estate and Multi-Strategy tables in the same report are not imported. View source

Figures are as each LP reports them for its own investment, so they can differ between LPs because of timing, fees, and share class. Not investment advice.